Re: [Full-disclosure] XSS Vulnerability in the Youtube Gallery 3.4.0 Component

2014-03-16 Thread Mahmoud Ghorbanzadeh
The CVE-2013-5956 has been assigned for this vulnerability. Best Regards. On Saturday, March 15, 2014 2:07 PM, Mahmoud Ghorbanzadeh md...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Youtube Gallery 3.4.0 component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to inject

[Full-disclosure] exploit for old rlpdaemon bug

2014-03-16 Thread Nomen Nescio
#!/opt/perl5/bin/perl -w # HP-UX rlpdaemon local exploit # Bulletin HPSBUX0111-176 (November 2001) # # For use only on machines where you have legitimate root. # This attempts to add junk (including localhost +) to /.rhosts. # Obvious variants could include /etc/passwd. use IO::Socket; $PORT =

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread Alfred Beese
Some of the replies in this thread are very unfair to the original poster. I have read the news story and have thoroughly read the proof of concepts which in my opinion indicate that this is surely a security vulnerability. I have worked for Lumension as a security consultant for more than

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread M Kirschbaum
Gynvael Coldwind,   What Alfred has reiterated is that this is a security vulnerability irrelevantly of whether it qualifies for credit.   It is an unusual one, but still a security vulnerability. Anyone who says otherwise is blind, has little or no experience in hands on security, or either 

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread T Imbrahim
Hello... I am an IT security expert for the Emirates National Oil Company. Google is my favourite search engine by far. Now I just read the report about the unrestricted upload issue and I think that the author is right that it is a securityproblem.This is a vulnerability because file name

Re: [Full-disclosure] [SPAM] [Bayesian][bayesTestMode] Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread Thomas Williams
I signed onto this mailing list as an interested person in security - not to see everyone moan. We will all have differences in opinion and we should all respect that. This goes for everyone and I feel I speak for a lot of people here, everyone needs to grow up, and shut up. Email scanned

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread T Imbrahim
Hello, I am a security professional and risk manager in UAE. I support that the remote file upload on YouTube is a vulnerability, and I am sure about this. Not the slightest doubts... There is a different between a vulnerability and an exploit. The vulnerability here is the lack of any file

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread T Imbrahim
Is this treated with the same way that says that Remote File Inclusion is not a security issue ? You don't follow? Implying ? I understand why nobody likes Google. If I 've found a vulnerability and been treated like that for trying to help, I would rather sell it to the black market or to

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread T Imbrahim
The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding it was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I voiced my support that this is a vulnerability. I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you didn't follow. So I am just saying that treating

Re: [Full-disclosure] [SPAM] [Bayesian][bayesTestMode] Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread Exibar
LOL. boy oh boy you would have HATED the N3td3v years then... I'm sure your delete key works doesn't it? From: Full-Disclosure [mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Thomas Williams Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 10:44 AM To: Mario Vilas Cc: