Last saturday I watched a lecture by Jurgen Habermas.
He supported the idea of a citizen's income.
Two reasons he gave was:
1. Given globalisation and lesser opportunity for the countries to
control their economies and increased competition; it becomes almost
impossible to avoid considerable un
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Camp. for Responsible Technology" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wworking women and toxics
Dear Friends--
Our allies in England forwarded this article that appeared in the Washington
Pos
Dear Mr. Blackmore:
Excuse my inability to understand your citizenship. I guess I don't know
the answer to your question, however, I am going down to register as a
Conservative Party Member this afternoon and I will inquire.
You asked, "So, apart from MAI and a free trade bias (on what basis?",
The following letter and report are being sent this week to a
number of residents and organizations in the Ottawa area and
to the media.
Ottawa September 1998
Dear Commun
Dear Keith:
I heartily endorse your analysis and I would like to point out that this may
actually become a trend/direction in the future - to actually redistribute
money from the highest level to the lowest level - to create a circularity
of energy. Leaving aside all the excesses and stupidities
Dear Mr. Blackmore:
Thanks for your interest. In Canada we have traditionally had two political
parties, the Liberals and Conservatives with the Conservatives, from the
founding of Canada up until the second term of our last Prime Minister Brain
Mulroney, being against the concept of Free Trade
