-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Salvador R.
Sánchez Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Lawrence, thank you very
Reuss
Verzonden: donderdag 15 augustus 2002 16:14
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Lawry de Bivort wrote:
You reveak your ignorance, Chris: not permitted to talk to a burka'ed
woman? This shows how little you know...
Are you saying
- Original Message -
From: jan matthieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:48 AM
I wonder if not having to wear a burka can be considered a human right.
I would say that NOT HAVING TO wear it SHOULD BE considered a human right.
In any case, as was repeatedly stated
Chris,
Lawry de Bivort wrote:
You reveak your ignorance, Chris: not permitted to talk to a
burka'ed woman?
This shows how little you know...
Are you saying that sources like the following are wrong ?
http://www.purpleberets.org/international_gender_apartheid.html
Afghan women
...
in such discussion.
Best regards,
Lawry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka
Salvador R. Sánchez Gutiérrez wrote:
[snip]
As Karen said, it's a question between fundamentalism (archaism?) and
modernism. Clothing is not a trivial issue, it is an individual
manifestation of identity and belonging but also a display of social traits,
practices and customs. Freedom to
, August 14, 2002 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Lawry deBivort wrote:
Have you ever asked a nun or a catholic woman whether they feel
oppressed
when they wear 'habit' or cover themselves?
Becoming a nun or being/remaining
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Christoph Reuss; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Well,it is a delight to see another white western male so knowledgeable
about these matters. So, to my rapidly expanding list
Well, Arthur, it is that assumption, precisely, that I am challenging. How
would you know you don't have to talk to any of them? How in the world can
you be so certain, except by simply (and possibly blindly) 'being certain'.
It is, I would suggest, an untested and hence unmerited certainty.
If
Are you challenging the notion of choice?
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence de Bivort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Well, Arthur, it is that assumption
Lawry, you have completely missed my point: That there's much more to
social science than simply asking victims whether they _feel_ victimized.
That's like asking a SUV driver whether he feels safe, and when Bubba says
Yea, then conclude that SUVs _are_ safe. It just ain't that simple, Lawry.
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: Sociology/Victimology 101 (was Re: Women love the burka!)
Well, Arthur, it is that assumption, precisely, that I am challenging. How
would you know you don't have to talk to any of them? How in the world can
you be so
Greetings, Salvador,
Many thanks for your email. I only wish I spoke Spanish as well as you
speak English!
I am not an English speaking person, as I guess you know. My knowledge of
your language is very limited. That's why I am curious about the
meaning of
an expresion you use recurrently
Lawrence, thank you very much for your kind reply.
[...]
By the way, are there significant differences between western males and
eastern males, or western females, in terms of certainty? Is the answer
a
certainty itself?
I focused on western males because we were talking a Muslim and
14 matches
Mail list logo
