hi stephen,
i'm running cygwin / xfree86 / fvwm ( 2.4.0 ) under nt4 - smooth as.
i gave up on using reflectionx since it was a pita to get started. also
i had to run fvwm on a remote box ( 1000 km away ) so it's quicker
this way as well. i think it compiled as is.
regards,
siegfried.
-Orig
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Dennison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:36 PM
> To: fvwm@fvwm.org
> Subject: FVWM: Cygwin
>
>
> I recently compiled fvwm under cygwin. To my amazement it actually
> worked! Unfortunately it's not exactly... well you kno
I recently compiled fvwm under cygwin. To my amazement it actually
worked! Unfortunately it's not exactly... well you know... stable. I was
just wondering if anyone else had tried to run fvwm2 under cygwin using
the X server supplied by XFree86.org.
Oh, and I'm running it on a windows 98 machine
On 10 Apr 2002 19:09:35 +, Frank Liu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > Debug libs/fvwmsignal.c functions. It seems that fvwmSelect (a wrapper
> > for select) does not work as expected on QNX, but I can only guess.
>
> thanks for the hint. I tracked down to the in
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> Here are my suggestions.
>
> If you want to port, subscribe to fvwm-workers list.
>
> Start with an empty fvwmrc file: fvwm2 -f no-fvwmrc
I was doing that already and no help.
>
> Debug libs/fvwmsignal.c functions. It seems that fvwmSelect (a wra
Markus Grunwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I saw in the list, that there is a version 2.5 of fvwm. Will my old
> config files work with that one without lots of editing?
If you are coming from 2.2.5, you should go to
the stable official release. Ie. 2.4.6.
There is a conversion script
On 10 Apr 2002 18:24:59 +0200, Markus Grunwald wrote:
>
> I saw in the list, that there is a version 2.5 of fvwm. Will my old
> config files work with that one without lots of editing?
It is suggested to use the stable 2.4.6 version unless you badly need
some feature in the unstable branch.
Run
Hi!
I saw in the list, that there is a version 2.5 of fvwm. Will my old
config files work with that one without lots of editing?
Thanks,
--
Markus Grunwald
Registered Linux User Nr 101577
http://counter.li.orghttp://www.grunwald.2xs.de
--
Visit the official FVWM web page a
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] szonyi calin wrote:
> --- Frank Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ?crit?: >
> > any thoughts on what further debugging/testing I can
> > do to
> > find out the root cause?
> >
> > thanks!
> > frank
> >
>
> if you have in fvwm2rc lines like this
> +"text"Exe
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tom Alsberg wrote:
> Hi there, Frank.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 10:42:31PM +, Frank Liu wrote:
> > fvwm2.4.6, xfree 4.2.0, qnx4.25
> >
> > when I run fvwm2 from the xterm, the mouse pointer becomes busy,
> > and the only way to get out is "ctrl-alt-backspace" to get bac
On 01 Apr 2002 22:42:31 +, Frank Liu wrote:
>
> fvwm2.4.6, xfree 4.2.0, qnx4.25
>
> when I run fvwm2 from the xterm, the mouse pointer becomes busy,
> and the only way to get out is "ctrl-alt-backspace" to get back console.
I guess someone should port FVWM to QNX first.
> I enabled debug an
On 10 Apr 2002 13:13:55 +0200, szonyi calin wrote:
>
> if you have in fvwm2rc lines like this
> +"text"Exec program
> instead of
> + "text" Exec exec program
> this could be the cause
>
> Fvwm is waiting for a comand to finnish and it is
> busy until that command finishes
--- Frank Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
> any thoughts on what further debugging/testing I can
> do to
> find out the root cause?
>
> thanks!
> frank
>
if you have in fvwm2rc lines like this
+"text"Exec program
instead of
+ "text" Exec exec program
this could be th
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:04:59PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 09 Apr 2002 22:40:47 +, Frank Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Frank Liu wrote:
> >
> > > fvwm2.4.6, xfree 4.2.0, qnx4.25
> > >
> > > when I run fvwm2 from the xterm, the mouse pointer becomes busy,
> > > and the onl
14 matches
Mail list logo
