Re: CVS olicha: * Clip text and icon drawing for the fvwm icons

2002-09-26 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:04PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 25 Sep 2002 19:35:10 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:49:19PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 24 Sep 2002 12:22:26 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 09:19:30AM

CVS olicha: * Fixed focus/unfocus icons flickering

2002-09-26 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: olicha 02/09/26 05:25:07 Modified files: . : ChangeLog fvwm : add_window.c borders.c events.c geometry.c icons.c update.c icons.h libs :

Re: CVS olicha: * Clip text and icon drawing for the fvwm icons

2002-09-26 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:04PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 25 Sep 2002 19:35:10 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:49:19PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 24 Sep 2002 12:22:26 +0200,

Icon functionality

2002-09-26 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 26 Sep 2002 12:14:02 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: I think we need a lot of new icon styles: IconTitleColorset HilightIconTitleColorset IconBackgroundStyle [Colorset cset] [Frame x] [Padding x y] and maybe a

Re: FVWM: 'Next' window based on coordinates?

2002-09-26 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 25 Sep 2002 20:12:48 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: But all that functionality *must* be in the core. Modules work in parallel to the core which is fine for some functionality, but totally unacceptable for the scripting

Re: FvwmIdent drawing screwed

2002-09-26 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:26:00PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:55:24PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:13:58PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: But what about making FvwmIdent

Re: Icon functionality

2002-09-26 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 26 Sep 2002 12:14:02 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: I think we need a lot of new icon styles: IconTitleColorset HilightIconTitleColorset

Re: Icon functionality

2002-09-26 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 26 Sep 2002 12:14:02 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: Returning to our flickering. It is annoying. Can the drawing be done somehow behind the scene, so

CVS olicha: * Fixed icons colorset update

2002-09-26 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: olicha 02/09/26 10:03:59 Modified files: . : ChangeLog fvwm : update.c Log message: * Fixed icons colorset update -- Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/. To

Re: Icon functionality

2002-09-26 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 26 Sep 2002 16:08:34 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 26 Sep 2002 12:14:02 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: I think we need a lot of new icon styles:

[PATCH] Add GTK+ 2.0 support to FvwmGtk

2002-09-26 Thread Eric Gillespie
This patch adds support for GTK+ 2.0 to FvwmGtk in addition to 1.2, not replacing it. If you have both versions installed, it defaults to 2.0 unless you pass --without-gtk2 to configure. When using GTK+ 2.0, Imlib is not necessary and thus not used. As for GNOME, that could be used, but i don't

Re: FvwmIdent drawing screwed

2002-09-26 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 04:05:34PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:26:00PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:55:24PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:13:58PM

Re: [PATCH] Add GTK+ 2.0 support to FvwmGtk

2002-09-26 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 26 Sep 2002 21:25:42 -0500, Eric Gillespie wrote: Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your changes in configure.in are not very good, we should check for a correctness of the gtk headers and libs found, a user may have pkg-config, but not the gtk libs. Yes, i tested this

FVWM: Givning FVWM the right environment

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, everybody. I'm working on giving FVWM the correct environment (variables etc) so that application I run from FVWM functions correctly. I know I can just define them in my ~/.xinitrc but that's kind of ugly, so I'm just curious how other people have solved this? Regards, Johan Svedberg --

Re: FVWM: 'Next' window based on coordinates?

2002-09-26 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 08:58:40PM -0500, Victor Eijkhout wrote: How do I cycle through windows so that Next takes the one with next highest x coordinate? Try the Direction command. Could someone look at the source for obvious bugs in this? I set up Shift-{Left,Right} to

RE: FVWM: CDEmu link

2002-09-26 Thread Riswick, J.G.A. van
Hi to make the theme work I needed some features of fvwm 2.5.3. However, in the meantime, the development has of course continued, and I haven't yet adapted the script to some of the changes. So you need to use a somewhat older snapshot to make the script work:

FVWM: remote mozilla

2002-09-26 Thread elliot sowadsky
I'm running mozilla remotely and i find that not long after it's been running, it takes longer and longer for mozilla to give control back to fvwm. Is there anyting i can set to prevent mozilla from blocking fvwm from doing its thing? I'm running 2.5.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 (mozilla 1.1 on 5.8).

re: FVWM: remote mozilla

2002-09-26 Thread elliot sowadsky
I'm running mozilla remotely and i find that not long after it's been running, it takes longer and longer for mozilla to give control back to fvwm. Is there anyting i can set to prevent mozilla from blocking fvwm from doing its thing? I tried Mozilla 1.1 from Linux to Linux over a cable

Re: FVWM: remote mozilla

2002-09-26 Thread Dan Espen
elliot sowadsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm running mozilla remotely and i find that not long after it's been running, it takes longer and longer for mozilla to give control back to fvwm. Is there anyting i can set to prevent mozilla from blocking fvwm fro m doing its thing? I

re: FVWM: remote mozilla

2002-09-26 Thread elliot sowadsky
Maybe the X server is getting more traffic than it can handle. Does the cursor blinking in Mozilla slow down? The cursor only blinks when its in an input field. Are there animations visible? It's initially ok and then gets worse over time. Is it just Fvwm that slows down or is Mozilla slow

FVWM: A gentle pointer... (FvwmForm)

2002-09-26 Thread Len Philpot
Can someone point me in the right direction? I have the following simple FvwmForm definition : *RunCommandTitle Run a command *RunCommandFore black *RunCommandBack grey70 *RunCommandFont *helvetica*b*r*n*14* *RunCommandFore navy *RunCommandLine center *RunCommandFont *helvetica*b*r*n*12*

Re: FVWM: A gentle pointer... (FvwmForm)

2002-09-26 Thread Dan Espen
Len Philpot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can someone point me in the right direction? I have the following simple FvwmForm definition : ,,, This works fine, but I'd like to add a last command button to the form. Adding the additional button is easy, but I'm stumped on how to : 1. Save

FVWM: Printer friendly man pages

2002-09-26 Thread Russell
Hi, Is there any fvwm2 manual that is formatted for printing with an apropriate fit to A4 pages like a pdf? I can only print from a windows box at the moment. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at URL: http://www.fvwm.org/. To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm in the body of a

FVWM: getting back to old behavior of pager (just upgraded to 2.4.6) DSB

2002-09-26 Thread Daniel Barclay
How can I configure the pager window so that it behaves as before? (I just upgraded to FVWM version 2.4.6 (by upgrading to Debian 3.0 (woody)).) Specifically, it used to work like this: - if I raised it, it went into stay-on-top mode; - if I lowered it, it lowered and partipated normally in