In message ,
Dan Espen wrote:
>So, I'm afraid I can't duplicate your issue but I can see gthumb
>is really buggy.
I'm not sure that's a proper assumption.
Gthumb works well enough for me on both Ubuntu (18.04) and FreBSD (12.0).
No crashes at all so far.
And anyway, even if the thing
Ok, so, I deleted the line
setenv DISPLAY localhost:0.0
from my ~/.login file and then exited X, logged out (console) and
then logged back in (console again) and checked. At that point,
the environment variable DISPLAY wasn't set at all. I then started
up X (via xinit) as I am accustomed
In message <20190617205926.mwzkffi363jut...@bennettconstruction.us>,
chris wrote:
>> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.tristatelogic.com
>
>
>Having localhost.tristatelogic.com after localhost seems to be wrong to
>me. Forgive me if I am mistaken.
This reminds me of that old saying... "In
In message
,
Stephen Dennison wrote:
>There's probably nothing wrong with localhost per se...
OK. I guess that's the good news.
>> Basically, once I start up X and fvwm, I see that all of my xterm
>> windows are automagically inheriting the following environment variable
>> and the value
In message ,
Dan Espen wrote:
>"Ronald F. Guilmette" writes:
>> What about the second issue I mentioned? That one is far more serious.
>> Why doesn't chrome{ium} behave itself in a normal fashion, just like
>> everything else, and pop to the foreground when yo
I had asked about how to get a digital xclock in the empty space just under
the analog xclock and the xbiff thingy in the default theme for fvwm...
In message ,
Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
>Add this command to your StartFunction
>
>AddToFunc StartFunction I Test (Init) Exec exec xlock -digtal
Sorry. My bad, I forgot to attach the xprop output file to my prior
emssage. It is attached to this one.
GDK_TIMESTAMP_PROP(GDK_TIMESTAMP_PROP) = 0x61
WM_STATE(WM_STATE):
window state: Normal
icon window: 0x40018a
_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS(CARDINAL) = 7, 7, 31, 7
In message
firefox.xprop wrote:
>This is probably because my memory is failing me (I wasn't able to
>double check what resource/class firefox uses these days).
>
>Use FvwmIdent or xprop and figure out the correct resource/class of
>firefox on your system and use that instead of 'firefox' in
In message
Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
>If you don't like the icon provided by the application you can
>configure fvwm to use custom icons via the Icon Style (or
>WindowStyle). For example if you find a firefox icon and put it in
>your ImagePath, you can tell fvwm to use it for firefox as follows:
In message <20190531001538.084a9320...@apps1.cs.toronto.edu>,
Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> The bad news is that modern EWMH X programs generally don't supply
>their icons as files in the filesystem; instead, they provide multiple
>sizes of icons as X properties, which you can usually see by
Other than the questions I've alreasdy posted, I just have one
more and then I think I'm done. If i can find a solution for
this and the others I've posted, then I think I'll be a happy
camper.
On the new system I'm configuring, I'm running without any
.fvwmrc file in the home directory of the
In message
, you wrote:
>On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:43 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> First, the icon used to repreesent minimuzed Firefox windows is
>> substantially larger than t was for the prior version(s) of fvw
Greetings,
I'm upgrading/replacing a rather old FreeBSD system that I've been
neglecting for some time, and I installed the latest and greatest
fwvm package on this new FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE system. All appears
to be working well so far, but there are two small annoyances.
First, the icon
Is it just me, or has anyone else experienced an oddity where the window
containing acroread, unlike all other applications windows, fails to have
a standard sort of minimization button in the upper right hand corner of the
window frame?
Is this is a known problem?
Is there a workaround?
Greetings again,
I should start by saying thank you to all of you who tried to help me
the last time I dropped in here... quite a long time ago. I really did
appreciate how much you all were willing to try to help me to transition
from fvwm 1.24 to fvwm 2.xx, but ya know, some people just
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], you w
rote:
2008/8/10 Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://edulinux.homeunix.org/~n6tadam/fvwm2rc-ronald
Did you send me mail with this link before now?? I must have mised it
entirely for some reason.
So I am curious to know if this is OK -- or not. Some
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], you wr
ote:
2008/8/5 Ronald F. Guilmette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want a console xterm window (iconified) in the upper right of
my screen, with a small font. Even though I start up X as an
ordinary non-root user, I want that console xterm to be associated
Greetings,
I've been using fvwm for a long long long long time, but I was
never really very good at it. In fact, I've been using 1.24
for literally ages and ages. Now I want to _finally_ transition
myself to fvwm2, but ... and this is a weird sort of criticism,
I know... the thing is just TOO
18 matches
Mail list logo
