Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:10:34AM +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
Other than what we do anyway? No. What exactly would a special
feature be? All menus being decorated with a birthday cake in
the backgroung on
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:10:34AM +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
Other than what we do anyway? No. What exactly would a special
feature be? All menus being decorated with a birthday cake in
the backgroung on
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
jos
-Original Message-
From: parv
* Finish the 2.6 release before that day.
shouldn't that be an maybe item as that release will server nobody
if it would be only in name sake? i would much prefer a stable
version (any of
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:10:34AM +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
Other than what we do anyway? No. What exactly would a special
feature be? All menus being decorated with a birthday cake in
the backgroung on that day?
jos
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
jos
-Original Message-
From: parv
* Finish the 2.6 release before that day.
shouldn't that be an maybe item as that release will server nobody
if it would be only in name sake? i would much prefer a stable
version (any of
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:10:34AM +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
yes, are there any special features planned for 2.6?
Other than what we do anyway? No. What exactly would a special
feature be? All menus being decorated with a birthday cake in
the backgroung on that day?
jos
What I have in mind is a release that we can point at that isn't
two years old. I am planning to spend less time before the 2.6
release anyway. I will definitely not push it if it isn't
stabilizing fast enough.
Bye
Does spending less time mean fvwm development if canceled ? And - I
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Rastislav Galia wrote:
What I have in mind is a release that we can point at that isn't
two years old. I am planning to spend less time before the 2.6
release anyway. I will definitely not push it if it isn't
stabilizing fast enough.
Does
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote fvwm-workers thusly...
On the first of June, 2003, we will be celebrating fvwm's tenth
birthday. It may seem an eternity now
no kidding...
(o = maybe, * = must):
* Finish the 2.6 release before that day.
shouldn't that be an maybe item as that
