Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt writes: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:28:11AM +, Thomas Adam wrote: >> Can we then officially retire the Jitterbug? It's awful, no longer >> maintained upstream, and frankly we had a much better success rate >> tracking bugs on this mailing list. > > That's fine with me. We neve

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:28:11AM +, Thomas Adam wrote: > Hello -- > > 2009/2/27 Dominik Vogt : > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: [snip] > I've spent about the last three hours looking through the Jitterbug > (which is a disaster in usability and User Interface

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Thomas Adam
Hello -- 2009/2/27 Dominik Vogt : > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I realise this might seem controversial, and indeed this question has come up >> from time to time, but this time I will ask it and give proposals; the >> question is: >> >> When will F

CVS tadam: Shuffle todo-2.6 around.

2009-02-27 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: tadam 09/02/27 17:40:34 Modified files: docs : ChangeLog todo-2.6 Log message: Shuffle todo-2.6 around. This deprecates the "Closed recently" section, moving all entries therein under "Closed".

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: > Hello, > > I realise this might seem controversial, and indeed this question has come up > from time to time, but this time I will ask it and give proposals; the > question is: > > When will FVWM 2.5.X go stable? The simple truth is: