-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/10 04:04, Thomas Adam wrote:
On 22 March 2010 05:28, Harald Dunkel ha...@darkharri.de wrote:
It would be very nice if such a patch could get into the next release.
Please try the CVS version -- hopefully fixed now.
Seems to work. No
On 22 March 2010 05:28, Harald Dunkel ha...@darkharri.de wrote:
It would be very nice if such a patch could get into the next release.
Please try the CVS version -- hopefully fixed now.
Sorry for the delay on this.
-- Thomas Adam
On 22 March 2010 05:28, Harald Dunkel ha...@darkharri.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/10 23:32, Thomas Adam wrote:
Any more thoughts on this? Unless anyone objects, I will go ahead and do
this on Monday evening.
Any news about the blind spots for
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:18:40PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:14:28PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:35:16PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
All,
I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've
seen a number of
All,
I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've
seen a number of sufficient changes in CVS since then which makes me
question whether I should undertake the release process and issue a new
unstable 2.5.29 release.
What do others think?
The only odd quirk I can
