At the moment, I am a bit unhappy with the window like layout.
Take a look at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site/features.php
Is it just me, or does anybody else find the text arranged in
windows confusing? I tend to favour the idea to make one big
window and arrange the text
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:30:32PM -0800, Elliot Sowadsky wrote:
2.5.6 on solaris 5.8
piperead example in faq gives shell syntax error
AddToFunc CenterWindow
+ I ThisWindow Piperead echo Move \
$(( $[vp.width]/2-$[w.width]/2 ))p \
$(( $[vp.height]/2-$[w.height]/2
Hi there,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Dominik Vogt wrote:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site/features.php
Is it just me, or does anybody else find the text
arranged in windows confusing? I tend to favour the idea
to make one big window and arrange the text blocks inside
as it
On Mon, Mar 24 at 10:33, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:30:32PM -0800, Elliot Sowadsky wrote:
2.5.6 on solaris 5.8
piperead example in faq gives shell syntax error
AddToFunc CenterWindow
+ I ThisWindow Piperead echo Move \
$(( $[vp.width]/2-$[w.width]/2
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:31:11 +0100
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
At the moment, I am a bit unhappy with the window like layout.
Take a look at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site/features.php
Is it just me, or does anybody else find the text arranged in
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:49:10 +0100
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changed. At the moment I am playing around with the web
sites. There are several things I don't like on the current
design
Hooray! I'm glad to see they finally got your directory back online.
I'll
With no discussion going on anymore, do we all agree on the
competition rules draft in cvs? What about the schedule?
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the
body of a message to
Jason, can you please enable php stuff in apache running on fvwm.org?
If you don't know what to do for this, you may ask here.
I think there is a consensus that the web design of Uwe is good and we
may try to go with it (the exact look is configurable by a visitor).
Since it uses php files not
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:15AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
This is what the Solaris 8 man page says about popen (what PipeRead uses):
execl(/usr/bin/ksh, ksh, -c, command, (char *)0);
This is actually a bug in Solaris 8, which is fixed with patch 108827-40
(108828-40 for x86), so
Danek Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:15AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
This is what the Solaris 8 man page says about popen (what PipeRead uses):
execl(/usr/bin/ksh, ksh, -c, command, (char *)0);
This is actually a bug in Solaris 8, which is fixed
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:43:58PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
On my Solaris 8 system, /usr/xpg4/bin/sh is a link to /usr/bin/ksh
which happens to the the same as /bin/ksh.
The sh man page confirms this:
The /usr/xpg4/bin/sh utility is identical to /usr/bin/ksh.
Okay. This is
Danek Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:43:58PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
On my Solaris 8 system, /usr/xpg4/bin/sh is a link to /usr/bin/ksh
which happens to the the same as /bin/ksh.
The sh man page confirms this:
The /usr/xpg4/bin/sh utility is
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:18:59PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Command Result in /bin/ksh Result in /usr/xpg4/bin/sh
echo $((010+10 )) 20 18
echo $((010+10 )) 29 error
[ 10 -le $((011)) ] true false
On 24 Mar 2003 15:42:35 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
With no discussion going on anymore, do we all agree on the
competition rules draft in cvs? What about the schedule?
I would not add a Prize section. Although it may be no problem for
someone to take out of a pocket 100 euro (I don't know),
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0800, Michael Han wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:18:59PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Command Result in /bin/ksh Result in /usr/xpg4/bin/sh
echo $((010+10 )) 20 18
echo $((010+10 )) 29
Danek Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0800, Michael Han wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:18:59PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Command Result in /bin/ksh Result in /usr/xpg4/bin/s
h
echo $((010+10 )) 20 18
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:02:16PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
How about a bug report for the lack of posix compliance in /bin/sh?
Or is it a compiler issue or popen?
/bin/sh (and all the other utilities in /bin) is not expected to be
posix compliant. If you want posix compliance, you should be
17 matches
Mail list logo
