On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:26:14PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I want to remove completely it once the code has been tested well
> enough. It's just there for the moment in case something happens.
OK. I'm now about to merge this to master.
Thanks,
Thomas
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 06:16:02PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:02:33AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Mostly done, except a couple of comments where there's still work
> > to do.
>
> OK, I'll wait for those.
These won't go away anytime soon. First I'd need to figure
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:02:33AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Mostly done, except a couple of comments where there's still work
> to do.
OK, I'll wait for those.
I've not noticed any crashes from running this for three days now.
Note that I still don't think we should hide the debugging
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:23:20PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:38:09PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > The parser branch is a ready as it will be without people testing
> > it more. The upstream branch dv/master hat the latest, merged
> > together patches with extensive
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:23:20PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:38:09PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > The parser branch is a ready as it will be without people testing
> > it more. The upstream branch dv/master hat the latest, merged
> > together patches with extensive
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:38:09PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The parser branch is a ready as it will be without people testing
> it more. The upstream branch dv/master hat the latest, merged
> together patches with extensive debug to stderr enabled.
>
> Please take a look. If there are no
The parser branch is a ready as it will be without people testing
it more. The upstream branch dv/master hat the latest, merged
together patches with extensive debug to stderr enabled.
Please take a look. If there are no findings I'd like to put this
on master.
The patches also contain:
*
