Re: a simple 'FvwmConsole' patch

2005-08-04 Thread Piratero
> That site seems to be dead. i removed the patch, it seems pointless -- http://mrkotfw.zod.com.mx/

CVS domivogt fvwm-web: * Removed supernova logo, use a simple gradient logo.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm-web Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 18:46:49 Modified files: . : ChangeLog index.php Added files: fvwm-logo : fvwm-logo-gradient-small.png fvwm-logo-gradient.png Log message:

Re: a simple 'FvwmConsole' patch

2005-08-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:22:25AM -0700, Piratero wrote: > i don't know if it has been done already, but here is a lame patch to > add a title option to the 'FvwmConsole' module. if the title option is > not called, the default message will be displayed The FvwmConsole starts an xterm and passes

CVS domivogt: * Added check for supported system architectures.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 15:21:00 Modified files: . : ChangeLog configure.in Log message: * Added check for supported system architectures.

64-bit support complete (?)

2005-08-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
With my latest patches I *believe* fvwm supports 64-bit architectures cleanly. If you encounter any problems with this code (current cvs, tomorrow's snapshot or 2.5.14 and later), please report your findings. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description:

CVS domivogt: * 64-bit fixes.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 11:25:40 Modified files: . : ChangeLog NEWS fvwm : add_window.c events.c ewmh_events.c geometry.c icons.c modconf.c module_interface.c stac

Re: Notification: incoming/1396

2005-08-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:38:50AM -0500, fvwm-bug wrote: > new message incoming/1396 > > This was reported by a Debian user. I have looked into CVS, > and this patch did not seem to have been applied yet (as far as I can > tell). This is an old patch, but is still relevant to 2.5.10, I >

CVS domivogt: * Ported GNOME iand layer fixes to 2.4.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 04:30:24 Modified files: . : Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog NEWS fvwm : Tag: branch-2_4 gnome.c stack.c Log message: * Ported GNOME iand layer fixes to 2.4.

CVS domivogt: * Minor update.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 04:29:49 Modified files: fvwm : gnome.c Log message: * Minor update.

CVS domivogt: * Updated NEWS.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 04:29:32 Modified files: . : NEWS docs : ANNOUNCE Log message: * Updated NEWS.

CVS domivogt: * Fixed hang in button grabbing code.

2005-08-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt05/08/04 04:13:04 Modified files: . : ChangeLog fvwm : ewmh.c focus.c gnome.c stack.c modules: ChangeLog modules/FvwmScript: FvwmScript.1.in Log m

Re: Consistenst syntax of Style options

2005-08-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:30:26AM -0400, Parv wrote: > Currently (2.5.13), some of the options are negated by prefixing '!' > or "No", others still by appending 'Off', , etc. Is there any plan > (near or long term) to have consistent syntax of Style options? Yes, phasing out lots of inconsistent

Consistenst syntax of Style options

2005-08-04 Thread Parv
Currently (2.5.13), some of the options are negated by prefixing '!' or "No", others still by appending 'Off', , etc. Is there any plan (near or long term) to have consistent syntax of Style options? - Parv --