On 19 Jan 2006 01:16:28 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> OK. I'll do this in the morning, after I have slept.
We are not really in hurry. In fact, I would feel more comfortably before
applying any patch if its author tells that he runs fvwm with this patch
applied for several days without problems
On 19 Jan 2006 01:16:28 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:57:18AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > I am all for adding these conditions, but implementation is incorect .
> > HasBorders can't work, since you do not use any window info for it .
> > Hint: you may use has_no
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:57:18AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> I am all for adding these conditions, but implementation is incorect .
> HasBorders can't work, since you do not use any window info for it .
> Hint: you may use has_no_borders window flag for this.
Ah. But I di
On 18 Jan 2006 18:53:58 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> I'd been meaning to send these in for a while, but University work always
> seems to get in the way. :) I've created two patches[1] --- very minor
> ones that add two new conditionals:
>
> HasTitle -- Checks to see whether a window has a ti
Hello,
I'd been meaning to send these in for a while, but University work always
seems to get in the way. :) I've created two patches[1] --- very minor
ones that add two new conditionals:
HasTitle -- Checks to see whether a window has a titlebar or not.
HasBorders -- Checks to see whether a wi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:44:26PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:24:01PM +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
> > Hello, I would really like to appeal for the removal of the XBell()
> > at line 1029 in fvwm/functions.c, part of execute_complex_function().
> >
>
> That's fine with
On 18 Jan 2006 12:45:21 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:44:49PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > Just tested. Mere "make" is broken on the released fvwm-2.5.15 tarballs.
>
> Hrmpf, why didn't "make distcheck" catch this?
No matter how smart "make distcheck" is, it is
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >When using the ActiveColorset menustyle, you also have to specify
> >HiglightBack and/or ActiveFore (without arguments) in order to make the
> >style use the colorset. Just using
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:24:01PM +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
> Hello, I would really like to appeal for the removal of the XBell()
> at line 1029 in fvwm/functions.c, part of execute_complex_function().
>
> It doesnt serve any purpose as it is impossible to determine even if it
> was fvwm that r
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:44:49PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> Just tested. Mere "make" is broken on the released fvwm-2.5.15 tarballs.
Hrmpf, why didn't "make distcheck" catch this?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Viktor Griph wrote:
Hi
When using the ActiveColorset menustyle, you also have to specify
HiglightBack and/or ActiveFore (without arguments) in order to make the style
use the colorset. Just using ActiveAcolorset has no effect what-so-ever. I
think it would be good to make
Hi
When using the ActiveColorset menustyle, you also have to specify
HiglightBack and/or ActiveFore (without arguments) in order to make the
style use the colorset. Just using ActiveAcolorset has no effect
what-so-ever. I think it would be good to make ActivColorset imply
ST_DO_HILIGHT_FORE a
12 matches
Mail list logo
