On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:41:33AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> "git add -i" is extremely useful for not accidentally committing
It's "git add -pi" which I use all the time.
However, this is more about me hunting down which plugin is causing this and
turning it off.
Kindly,
Thomas
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:58:54PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 03:16:02PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Look at commit ba9f161998f7da942996bcf0d3f96baa8b249070. You
> > added new-parser.md, but also committed a complete reindentation
> > of functions.c.
>
> Oh heavens.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 03:16:02PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Look at commit ba9f161998f7da942996bcf0d3f96baa8b249070. You
> added new-parser.md, but also committed a complete reindentation
> of functions.c.
Oh heavens. That's not good at all. Clearly something has run in the
background and
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 11:17:52AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > It works on my local branch but not the one in Git because of the
> > reindentation commit. Can we please not reindent patches that are
> > still under development?
>
>
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> It works on my local branch but not the one in Git because of the
> reindentation commit. Can we please not reindent patches that are
> still under development?
I haven't reindented anything -- at least, not knowingly. Even then,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 08:51:46AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> This works,
Please revert this and apply the revert patch in my other message.
> but I am confused as to why it compiles fine for you:
It works on my local branch but not the one in Git because of the
reindentation commit. Can we
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:35:09PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Can you give me the error messages that cause it?
>
> See fvwm.log attached. It's possible I've missed a patch, but the code
> corresponding to this build is on the new-parser branch in git, FYI.
With the doc patch you also
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:35:09PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:23:26AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:15:43PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:09:35PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:23:26AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:15:43PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:09:35PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:54:53AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > A couple of patches for the
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:15:43PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:09:35PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:54:53AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > A couple of patches for the parser branch:
> > >
> > > 0001: Some cleanup.
> > > 0003: Fix function
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:09:35PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:54:53AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > A couple of patches for the parser branch:
> >
> > 0001: Some cleanup.
> > 0003: Fix function depth handling and an uninitialised function argument.
> > (I.e. a
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:54:53AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A couple of patches for the parser branch:
>
> 0001: Some cleanup.
> 0003: Fix function depth handling and an uninitialised function argument.
> (I.e. a crash)
Thanks; applied these two.
Kindly,
Thomas
A couple of patches for the parser branch:
0001: Some cleanup.
0002: The randr simulation patch from the other message.
0003: Fix function depth handling and an uninitialised function argument.
(I.e. a crash)
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
From
13 matches
Mail list logo