On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:50:21 +0200
> Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:30:19AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > Scott --
> > >
> > > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:27:22 +1000 Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:50:21 +0200
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:30:19AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Scott --
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:27:22 +1000 Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > > I noticed earlier that th
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:30:19AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Scott --
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:27:22 +1000 Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > > I noticed earlier that there is a discrepency in the FVWM manpage (2.5.X
> > > series is the only one to be fixed) fo
Scott --
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:27:22 +1000 Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > I noticed earlier that there is a discrepency in the FVWM manpage (2.5.X
> > series is the only one to be fixed) for the Wait command description. The
> > description says initially that the
> ThisWindow (thomas_adam) Wait godo :)
Ah, that was supposed to be "godot".
Scott. :)
Hi Thomas,
> I noticed earlier that there is a discrepency in the FVWM manpage (2.5.X
> series is the only one to be fixed) for the Wait command description. The
> description says initially that the command waits of "windowname". This is
> parly true -- the code in builtins.c apparently also c
Hello,
I noticed earlier that there is a discrepency in the FVWM manpage (2.5.X
series is the only one to be fixed) for the Wait command description. The
description says initially that the command waits of "windowname". This is
parly true -- the code in builtins.c apparently also checks for th
