On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:56:55AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
I don't normally use icon titles so I might have missed them
in previous tests. Also I'm not sure if leaks at termination
are really leaks, if you are going to exit, theres no point in
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:16:33AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:56:55AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
I don't normally use icon titles so I might have missed them
in previous tests.
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
I don't normally use icon titles so I might have missed them
in previous tests. Also I'm not sure if leaks at termination
are really leaks, if you are going to exit, theres no point in
freeing things. It does look like there were 8 icon fonts
9 2001 01:07, ?? :
Ah, I remember we discovered several memory leaks in X11. One
is in the XGetWMNormalHints() funtion which is called once for
every new window. Maybe it's one of those.
I want to note that last time I used XFree-4.1.0
--
Andrey Panov
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:34:44PM -0500, fvwm-bug wrote:
FVWM Bug Tracking notification
new message incoming/719
Full_Name: Andrey Panov
Version: 2.3.32
CVS_Date:
OS: linux-2.4.5
X_Server: XFree-4.0.3
Submission from: (NULL) (62.76.7.3)
I was running fvwm-2.3.32 for 8 days and
7 Июнь 2001 20:40, Вы написали:
Note that the top output is hard to interpret and does not
necessarily mean that fvwm itself is using this much memory. The
plain fvwm code has been tested for memory leaks very thoroughly,
so it's higly unlikely that we missed a leak this big. On the
other
Andrey Panov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that the top output is hard to interpret and does not
necessarily mean that fvwm itself is using this much memory. The
plain fvwm code has been tested for memory leaks very thoroughly,
so it's higly unlikely that we missed a leak this big. On
FVWM Bug Tracking notification
new message incoming/719
Message summary for PR#719
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fvwm occupies about 10M of memory
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:34:19 -0500
0 replies 0 followups
ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS
From [EMAIL
