?
> > >
> > > Multiple.
> > >
> > >> I suggest to replace the command "Periodic" with some option to the
> > >> Schedu
> > le
> > >> command
> > >
> > > The current specification for Schedule is:
&
quot;Periodic" with some option to the Schedu
> le
> >> command
> >
> > The current specification for Schedule is:
> >
> > Schedule delay_ms [command_id] command
> >
> > So, would something like the following do?
> >
> > Schedule dela
ommand
So, would something like the following do?
Schedule delay_ms [command_id] ["Periodic"] command
Perhaps someone has a better suggestion?
I think the above is good. The only problem with it is that if someone has
a function named Periodic and use to execute that with Schedulte t
ke the following do?
Schedule delay_ms [command_id] ["Periodic"] command
Perhaps someone has a better suggestion?
SCoTT. :)
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a proposed patch to add a new builtin function, Periodic.
>
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/scottsmedley/fvwm/periodic.patch
>
> Apply with: patch -p0 < periodic.patch
>
> It is similar to the Schedule builtin
Hi all,
Here is a proposed patch to add a new builtin function, Periodic.
http://members.optusnet.com.au/scottsmedley/fvwm/periodic.patch
Apply with: patch -p0 < periodic.patch
It is similar to the Schedule builtin except the function is invoked
every N milliseconds - even if a grab fails, or t
