On 29 Jun 2001 08:57:43 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
The Next [*] Focus command violates that rule, but unclutter fixes it
up. If you want to focus on a new window with either of these focus
models, warptowindow should be used.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Lorenz Minder wrote:
I don't actually think this is release critical, but I think it should
probably not be me to decide that, therefore I figured it would be
better to mention that anyway.
I have another problem with unclutter. Here's a minimal
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Lorenz Minder wrote:
I don't actually think this is release critical, but I think it should
probably not be me to decide that, therefore I figured it would be
better to mention that anyway.
I have another
Dominik Vogt wrote:
[...]
The problem is this:
When unclutter hides the pointer, it creates an invisible
subwindow to the window that currently contains the pointer.
Since the pointer generates an EnterNofity on the new window and
unclutter sends a synthetic EnterNotify on its parent so
%% Lorenz Minder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lm I have implemented a new Style, NoMouseFocusWithoutMotion which
lm causes windows not to get focus because of the mouse pointer, if
lm it hasn't moved before.
Without commenting one way or another on whether this is a good style or
not, you
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
The Next [*] Focus command violates that rule, but unclutter fixes it
up. If you want to focus on a new window with either of these focus
models, warptowindow should be used.
One inconvenient thing about warptowindow is that there's
I don't actually think this is release critical, but I think it should
probably not be me to decide that, therefore I figured it would be
better to mention that anyway.
I have another problem with unclutter. Here's a minimal config:
Style * SloppyFocus
Key Tab A M
There was an unclutter problem I reported back about then, that was
fixed almost immediately.
You say you are using a snap from early June; the very first thing to do
when you find a problem, well before bothering to spend any time
debugging it yourself, is to try the latest code.
If it still
Paul D. Smith wrote:
There was an unclutter problem I reported back about then, that was
fixed almost immediately.
No, your problem was in May, not June, according to my archive. (That's
BTW why I entitled it `Yet another ...'.) Moreover the bug descriptions
don't match.
You say you are using
Lorenz Minder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul D. Smith wrote:
There was an unclutter problem I reported back about then, that was
fixed almost immediately.
No, your problem was in May, not June, according to my archive. (That's
BTW why I entitled it `Yet another ...'.) Moreover the bug
10 matches
Mail list logo
