On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 03:54:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 02:15:58PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021, 14:13 Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > > Is Xinerama still useful for anything or can we remove it?
> > >
> > It has already been removed. Where are
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 03:54:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 02:15:58PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021, 14:13 Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > > Is Xinerama still useful for anything or can we remove it?
> > >
> > It has already been removed. Where are
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 02:15:58PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021, 14:13 Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> > Is Xinerama still useful for anything or can we remove it?
> >
> It has already been removed. Where are you seeing references to it?
Everywhere. I'll remove the junk on the
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:20:28PM +, Darren Marshall wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix a problem where clicking the mouse button to popup
the windowlist on the secondary screen of an xinerama setup always pops up on
the primary screen.
I'll apply the patch shortly. Thanks for your help.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 08:05:14PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
Currently, fvwm uses the icon boxes in the order of creation. So,
if one icon box is
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 08:05:14PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
Currently, fvwm uses the icon boxes in the order
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Is there a way to test screen size changes without Xinerama working?
With
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:57:20AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Is there a way to
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan, I looked at the icon box code in style.c because I wanted to
make it work with changes of the Xinerama state, but the matter is
too complex to write a patch in short time for me.
What
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:19:19PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan, I looked at the icon box code in style.c because I wanted to
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Is there a way to test screen size changes without Xinerama working?
With Xinerama emulation. Run configure with
$ ./configure --enable-xinerama-emulation
The screen is then split
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
Currently, fvwm uses the icon boxes in the order of creation. So,
if one icon box is created on screen 0 and one is created on
screen 1, all icons are placed on screen 0 until the icon box is
full, then all icons are put on screen 1. My question was
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
Currently, fvwm uses the icon boxes in the order of creation. So,
if one icon box is created on screen 0 and one is created on
screen 1, all icons are placed on screen 0 until the icon box is
full, then all
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Is there a way to test screen size changes without Xinerama working?
With Xinerama emulation. Run configure with
$
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Is there a way to test screen size changes without Xinerama working?
With
Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
Currently, fvwm uses the icon boxes in the order of creation. So,
if one icon box is created on screen 0 and one is created on
screen 1, all icons are
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 06:59:56PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:46:45AM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:30:20PM +0700, Dmitry
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan, I looked at the icon box code in style.c because I wanted to
make it work with changes of the Xinerama state, but the matter is
too complex to write a patch in short time for me.
What I want to do:
1) Default to using the primary screen for
Oops, ignore that comment about
XineramaSupportGetNumberedScrRect.
--
Dan Espen
444 Hoes Lane Room RRC 1C-214 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piscataway, NJ 08854 Phone: (732) 699-5570
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:46:45AM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:30:20PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
I've added an optional global switch,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:30:20PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
I've added an optional global switch, which means that
maximization should be made on a global screen, otherwise it is made on
the screen where the center of a window
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:46:45AM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:30:20PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
I've added an optional global switch, which means that
maximization should be made on a
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:30:20PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Hi!
This patch touches solely the move_resize.c. I've tried to modify
fvwm2.1, but my roff skills seem to be below what required to keep
Maximize description in the same style (the latter seems a bit
On 28 Jul 01 at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a problem with Xinerama Edgeresistance and different
screen sizes on the screens:
Layout:
screen 1 screen 2
+--++
| |+--+|
| || ||
| ||window||
On 28 Jul 01 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
The point is not cleaning the code, but a correct operation of modules
--
do you need a pager on non-primary screen?
I don't quit understand the question. Of course I'd usually
prefer the pager on the primary screen, but
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 09:35:49PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On 27 Jul 01 at 11:56, fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
- Code is written with 80 characters per line, a basic
indentation width of 2.
- Always compile the code with and without your ifdefs. Remove
all
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 09:42:42PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
On 28 Jul 01 at 13:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Please keep in mind that that fvwm is controlled and configured
by configuration commands, not by environment
On 28 Jul 01 at 13:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Please keep in mind that that fvwm is controlled and configured
by configuration commands, not by environment variables. It's
not necessary to make features configurable via the
environment. (I'll remove the corresponding
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 05:43:39PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
Hi!
That's part 1 of XineramaSupport v2 merger. It contains
libs/XineramaSupport.[ch] as drop-in replacements. Next part will be
configure script, followed by modules.
On 27 Jul 01 at 11:56, fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
- Code is written with 80 characters per line, a basic
indentation width of 2.
- Always compile the code with and without your ifdefs. Remove
all warnings (compile with 'make CFLAGS=-Wall -Werror -g).
Okay. I usually set
On 23 Jul 01 at 18:55, fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:34:52PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
Hi!
Attached is a new version of Xinerama patch. The .tgz contains a diff
file (against 05-Jul-2001 snapshot),
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:48:02PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On 23 Jul 01 at 18:55, fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:34:52PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
Hi!
Attached is a new version of
On 22 Jul 01 at 16:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 09:32:38PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
[SNIP]
7) Maximizing windows
[SNIP]
Implementation of 7 also doesn't look problematic, I can do it.
Perhaps we should first discuss how to implement the new
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:34:52PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
Hi!
Attached is a new version of Xinerama patch. The .tgz contains a diff
file (against 05-Jul-2001 snapshot), two new files in libs/, and a
description of what was
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 09:32:38PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On 22 Jul 01 at 12:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a list of features Xinerama support may or may not
support:
1) Window placement
2) Icon placement
3) Menu placement
4) Menu position hints
35 matches
Mail list logo
