On 28 Jul 01 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
> > The point is not cleaning the code, but a correct operation of modules
> > --
> > do you need a pager on non-primary screen?
>
> I don't quit understand the question. Of course I'd usually
> prefer the pager on the primary screen, but perhaps I wnat one on
> both screens.
What I meant is that introducing Xinerama support into fvwm2 binary, but
leaving modules still use XParseGeometry() is inconsistent -- the pieces of
code responsible for window's placement should be modified too (sorry for my
not-so-perfect english ;-). Otherwise in the case of the following layout:
+------+----+
| 1024 |800 |
| 768 |600 |
| +----+
+------+
too many things will tend to place themselves into the void.
___________________________________________________________________
Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov | Novosibirsk, RUSSIA
phone (383-2)-39-49-56 | The Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
| Lab. 5-13
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
