On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:50:57AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 17 Aug 2002 19:37:24 -0600, S. Anderson wrote:
...
configure:3248: `FcBool' undeclared (first use in this function)
you might be having the same problem as I once had. see
On 09:55 18 Aug 2002, Bruce M Beach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
| Funny, the following is incorrect in bash and ksh:
|% xterm ; xterm
|Yeah. I've seen the above % xterm ; xterm fail a million
|times and never learn because it doesn't make
Alas! Mikhael Goikhman spake thus:
Funny, the following is incorrect in bash and ksh:
% xterm ; xterm
In bash, the syntax you are looking for is simply 'xterm xterm'.
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/
--
Feel disillusioned? I've got some great new illusions, right
The real and simple truth is that the syntax of bash will
just drive you crazy.
Bruce
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL: http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
You forgot to say that you use the cvs version.
Oops ... you're right !
Thanks,
Giuseppe.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL: http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm in the body of a
message to [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:06:00PM -0500, Wilbert van Bakel wrote:
You are right,
I copied the header files into /usr/X11R6/include/Xft and now configure
recognizes xft2.
Would it be okay to replace xft1 by xft2, since I practically want to
build the whole system based on the new xft?
I
Hello list,
I recently, finally, pulled myself together to upgrade from 2.2.2 to
2.4.8, and I am pretty impressed about an apparent enhancement in
speed I really didn't suspect: I expected 2.4.8 to be slightly slower
actually, since it's more complex. Good work...
OK, here's the deal: make
On 18 Aug 2002 10:19:54 +0200, Ulrich Fahrenberg wrote:
I recently, finally, pulled myself together to upgrade from 2.2.2 to
2.4.8, and I am pretty impressed about an apparent enhancement in
speed I really didn't suspect: I expected 2.4.8 to be slightly slower
actually, since it's more
Hi folks!
I installed Fvwm 2.4.9 on my Linux box, and it looks like
some changes between 2.4.8 and 2.4.9 broke the FvwmPager module
somehow. (It's not system specific, happens on any system.)
The BalloonBack option has no effect. The small balloon windows
seem to always use the background color
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 18 Aug 2002 10:19:54 +0200, Ulrich Fahrenberg wrote:
[a lot of blab on symlinks pointing the wrong way and on old
fvwm2-binaries getting started when they shouldn't]
This is strange. I can't reproduce this behaviour with any shell.
Well I
10 matches
Mail list logo
