Hi all, I am having a problem with Check Point Enterprise Unlimited Users. I have
associated the license to IP address of SmartCenter Server. I have installed the
firewall and I have installed the license. During installation no error appears, but
when I reboot the server (I am in test mode
I have posted this before but not heard from anyone...If I can get your
comment on which one is much better hardware to run checkpoint I would
appreciate it?
ASF claims to offload NAT and have filters to sense the traffic on the
other hand Nokia+ CKP has smart defense...And ASF datasheet has much
We need to block access to the internet for certain users so I'm looking at
the possibility of using NetWare eDir using LDAP to have user enter there
login information to access the internet.
Is anyone using this configuration if so was it very difficult to get
working?
Thanks,
John Lindblom
Sascha,
I was just planing a small setup for an even smaller customer. My plan
was to use two Nokia IP130's with Checkpoint Express, using VRRP for
simple failover HA. Now my Checkpoint distributor raised his hand and
Yeah, you can do that. VRRP the external, the LAN, and the DMZ. You'll
We have evaluated the Nortel ASF in June. I can tell you that the only negative that
we found was the lack of a built-in sniffer (on the switch itself) since our current
platforms are either Solaris or Linux and they come with either snoop or tcpdump.
Other than that, the ASF performed
Agreed. Also, the new VRRP setup is Microsoft easy.state sync is overrated,
IMO. Nokias seem to run forever.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thorsten
Behrens
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL
[VRRP but no state sync]
Agreed. Also, the new VRRP setup is Microsoft
easy.state sync is overrated, IMO. Nokias seem to run forever.
I wouldn't go _that_ far. These guys do fail now and then (the HD, mostly); but more
importantly, there's always that next maintenance window to apply an
Hi All,
Anyone working with a Nortel Contivity VPN and Checkpoint NG AI? We put
an additional adapter in our Checkpoint and have terminated a small
wireless LAN into it. It's been great, users jump on the wireless, get
assigned a DHCP IP from a DHCP appliance and then can surf the web. Now
Hope I was clear, what I meant is UDP encapsulation is needed when using NAT-T since
ESP packets don't use port numbers, Nortel Contivity doesn't support this.
-Original Message-
From: Diotte, Shannon S.
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:45 PM
To: 'Mailing list for discussion of
We have been handed down a new policy that a certain set of computers
will only be allowed HTTP access to a specific set of blessed web sites.
We have been supplied with a set of URLs. I am trying to figure out the
best way to do this within FW-1. I have been looking through the HTTP
Security
Brooks, George [Contractor] wrote:
It seems that Checkpoint has a limitation that I did not have with my
Raptor firewall. In the past, all incoming requests to our email server
hid the address of the incoming mail server. This made it easy for us
to prevent our email server from being used as a
We're not and you hit the reason on the head: Akamai. Our ISP has one of
their edge of the Internet caching boxes and although the URLthey're going
to is to the big site, FW-1 shows the IP they're actually going to is on our
ISPs network, the Akamai cache device.
We stuck in a Microsoft ISA2000
1. Attach the licence to the management server
2. Install the policy
-Original Message-
From: Salomé Reíllo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2004 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW-1] Not valid license
Hi all, I am having a problem with Check Point Enterprise
13 matches
Mail list logo
