[fw-general] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Benjamin Eberlei
Hello everyone, 2 years ago I was pretty sure of the Dojo and jQuery components/integration into ZF. I have since changed my mind radically. I do maintained the jQuery component but I would suggest to drop it for 2.0 for the following reasons: 1. It encourages writing no JS code at all, this

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Dolf Schimmel
I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. However, if we decide to drop ZendX_Jquery (if not, who'll maintain it?), I think we at least should write some decent documentation on how one should decently implement Js with ZF.

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Paul Boivin
Agree with both Dolf and Benjamin. On 17 January 2011 13:50, Dolf Schimmel dolfschim...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. However, if we decide to drop ZendX_Jquery (if not, who'll maintain it?), I

[fw-general] Getting the full url when a default action is used

2011-01-17 Thread Ian Munday
Is there a way to force full urls when using the Url helper? My route is setup as: :module/:controller/:action And the default route is: default/index/index When I set the following using a helper I wish to have the url string default/dashboard/index returned, but instead I

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Jigal sanders
Please don't discontinue support for jQuery/ I think there are many people who use it On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Dolf Schimmel dolfschim...@gmail.comwrote: I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. However, if we

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Guy Halford-Thompson
I agree with this. For any application that requires more than a few lines of JavaScript, the JS should be kept in separate 'javascript' files. On 17 Jan 2011, at 18:47, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: Hello everyone, 2 years ago I was pretty sure of the Dojo and jQuery components/integration

Re: [fw-general] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Michel Lombart
Just a thought : To not wrote what is already wrote is also the use of a framework. If you go further, you may discontinue Zend because many people write less PHP code because it becomes impossible to rewrite your app using proper PHP code ! :-D . I believe that JS components are a must in a

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Phil Brown
Never used ZendX_Jquery for the exact reasons Benjamin's stated as reasons to abandon it, so that's an aye vote from me. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.dewrote: Hello everyone, 2 years ago I was pretty sure of the Dojo and jQuery components/integration