Dear Stephen,
Some selective responses. (On the Tel Dan Inscription, your comments are both incorrect and out of place on Megillot, and will therefore be ignored.)
You wrote:
"Russell, your misrepresentation included declaring that there was no evidence other that what you mentioned"
Au co
Russell Gmirkin,
In response: I do not agree with many of your recent statements. I'll mention
some and try to look for a more productive way forward than the recent
exchange.
Briefly, as you called my comments "incorrect," G. Athas, on detailed
observation, declared that dalets were carved in
Listers may be very interested in this story:
http://www.thepilot.com/features/r031605Scrolls.html
(i've attempted to blog this morning but blogger seems to have been
killed- so maybe I can blog this later if its revived)
--
Jim West
Biblical Studies Resources - http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
Bib
P.S. I could address further claims in R. Gmirkin's latest post, and will, if
seems useful.
And corroboration and coherence and chronological-suitability, for instance,
are all among important aspects of worthy proposals.
But I would like to state more clearly than I did before that the Qumran
The article doesn't specify what the "new" fragments are, but the mention of
Hanan Eshel makes me think of the one recent reference to new Qumran fragments
that I've seen in a scholarly publication, namely the extra fragment "6a" of
4Q226 "Pseudo-Jubilees" included with the edition of this text
Is is perhaps possible to close the unproductive thread before long?
I'd not like to recommend Erich Maria Remarque's 1929er "Nothing New in the
West" on gas-impregnated static warfare, but I guess the Nuremberg funnel
technique of selling/rejecting the not-present (like the emperor's new
clothe
I'd need to check papers at home to be more sure, and I don't have DSSR 3 at
hand, but, I think, tentatively, yes, this is one of the fragments mentioned
in the article and on display in the "Ink and Blood" exhibit, there called a
Genesis fragment. Photo:
http://www.inkandblood.com/wysiwyg-
uplo
The picture certainly fits DSSR 3 perfectly
thanks
Soren
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Stephen Goranson
> Sendt:16. marts 2005 16:46
> Til: g-megillot@McMaster.ca
> Emne: Re: [Megillot] dead sea scrolls for sale? - Pseu
That's worth $10,000,000? How much is 1QUsa-a worth?
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Søren Holst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:50 AM
Subject: [Megillot] dead sea scrolls for sale? - PseudoJubilees??
The picture certainly fits DSSR 3 perfectly
thanks
So
Pardon my lapse, but what's DSSR 3?
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 08:50, Søren Holst wrote:
> The picture certainly fits DSSR 3 perfectly
>
> thanks
> Soren
>
> > -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> > Fra:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] på
> > vegne af Stephen Goranson Sendt:16. m
Sorry about that.
"DSSR" is the newest text edition: "The Dead Sea Scrolls Reader", ed. Parry and
Tov, Leiden: Brill 2004-2005. Six paperback volumes. Reproduces text and
translation, often in improved and updated versions, of ALL of the non-biblical
Qumran DJD volumes + all the stuff published
It has sometimes been stated that the "teacher of righteousness" had either
served as the high priest or had expected to be named the high priest. Is
there good reason to state that?
best,
Stephen Goranson
___
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 09:52, Søren Holst wrote:
[snip]
> I wouldn't
> have minded a more precise index to tell you exactly where a text is, but
> still it seems the best single edition around - and semi-portable too! :-)
I'm not sure what kind of index you mean, but for a handy-dandy index o
No - it's just an inductive argument, first made by Stegemann, if memory
serves.
_Dierk
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: [Megillot] the teacher and the high priest?
It has sometimes been stated that
Dave,
I have your book and greatly appreciate it's contribution to scrolls work :-)
What I was thinking about was something much simpler: The DSSR has the texts
organized by genre rather than Q sigla (as DJD itself), so when I want 4Q365a I
may have to do a bit of rummaging about to discover
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 11:49, SÃren Holst wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I have your book and greatly appreciate it's contribution to scrolls work
> :-)
Thanks. It's nice to know it's being used.
> What I was thinking about was something much simpler: The DSSR has the
> texts organized by genre rather t
I've used it too, Dave.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Washburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Megillot] D.L. Washburn: A Catalog of Biblical Passages in the
Dead Sea Scrolls
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 11:49, SÃren Holst wrote:
Da
> The DSSR has the
> > texts organized by genre rather than Q sigla (as DJD itself), so when I
> > want 4Q365a I may have to do a bit of rummaging about to discover on
> > precisely what page of what volume it occurs. An index for that would have
> > been great. I hear Parry & Tov are working on a
18 matches
Mail list logo
