how the hell do i unsubscribe from this group, i have been getting E-mails
for the past few months of posts just flooding this account
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Stephen Conrad khel...@gmail.com wrote:
NOTE: They say the Old Interface is Unsupported
Hi,
You are using the New Interface
I moved an HP-PSC-1210 AIO Printer/Scanner/Copier to a network
connection attached via USB to a 1TB Time Capsule. I was bummed to see
that Apple doesn't support network scanning, it's printing only over
Apple wireless networks.
Now I see that this is a function of the router firmware, and
On 9/9/09 3:52 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:
but the idea that I could possibly scan over a
network device is attractive.
Here's the article I found on this subject:
http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/10/how-to-make-your-own-2.html
Thanks a lot for sharing , Kris. It's indeed a
She lives in the same town. She doesn't use photoshop but does do
video renering/conversion. But she has one of those Miglia USB video
H264 dongles that is suppossed to take most of the pressure off the
CPU's for that job. Other than that it's just internet. email and
youtube. So I'm not sure she
Addressing the original question, you could use the older (at least a
g3) Macs to build a Mac Cluster. There have been universities and
government agencies that have built, relatively inexpensive,
supercomputers using this method which is explained at this link;
I've been searching the net, and I've found all I needed. Now I just
need to decide which graphics card to get. Geforce vs Radeon. OEM vs
Retail.
I found some G5 only cards which look like they were designed for
the extra long AGP PRO slot, then I found some G4/G5 Pro cards which
claim
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:07 PM, John Niven wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
You could run multiple Apple Remote Desktop sessions to
each of the
other computers, but frankly, that won't work all that well
either.
Actually I already have that and
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Ron Romine wrote:
Dana mentioned getting a PCI-X compatible USB or USB/FW card. Is the
USB only 1.1? I thought it had 2.0.
No PCI-X USB card would have ever been USB1.1; USB2.0 predates the PCI-
X spec.
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:59 AM, falst...@46 wrote:
She lives in the same town. She doesn't use photoshop but does do
video renering/conversion. But she has one of those Miglia USB video
H264 dongles that is suppossed to take most of the pressure off the
CPU's for that job. Other than that it's
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability of OS X? or
maybe NeoOffice? some other app for OS X on a G4?
Maybe my
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:48 AM, falst...@46 wrote:
Addressing the original question, you could use the older (at least a
g3) Macs to build a Mac Cluster. There have been universities and
government agencies that have built, relatively inexpensive,
supercomputers using this method which is
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability of OS X? or
maybe
On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet
There are a couple listed in this article:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/171435/19_free_web_services_that_keep_saving_you_money.html?tk=nl_dnx_t_crawl
I dropped my land line so I need to take note of this as well.
Previously I would fax from the computer.
I have only tried efax as an
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Guess I need to temporarily bypass the DSL connection, hook up the
modem, and FAX away using OS Xs pdf to fax capability before/after
creating a pdf ... thanks.
No you shouldn't need to bypass the DSL connection to do this...the
modem is
Bruce Johnson wrote:
Len and Andreas clearly have more recent experience than I on this
subject; I'd go with their recommendations and stick to the Dual 1 Gig.
i can only add my personal experience. i do not use the apps you
mention. i do use apps (gaussian and spartan) that do very CPU
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:20 PM, ah...clem wrote:
Bruce Johnson wrote:
Len and Andreas clearly have more recent experience than I on this
subject; I'd go with their recommendations and stick to the Dual 1
Gig.
i can only add my personal experience. i do not use the apps you
mention. i do
--- On Wed, 9/9/09, ah...clem boneheads...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce Johnson wrote:
Len and Andreas clearly have more recent experience
than I on this
subject; I'd go with their recommendations and stick
to the Dual 1 Gig.
i can only add my personal experience. i do not use
the apps you
enough already!!
On Sep 8, 2009, at 7:03 PM, g...@gmx.net wrote:
smurf,chief of the group!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:20 AM, ah...clem wrote:
i never have other apps open when the computations are in
progress. i compared a QS/933 to a QS/1GDP and found that on
computations that required several hours to complete, the 933MHz was
(within 0.5%) exactly 93.3% as fast as the dual 1 gig.
for the price of a faster dual processor upgrade card, you could buy a way
way way faster dual g5.
-Jonas
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:20 AM, ah...clem wrote:
i never have other apps open when the computations are
I don't buy downloads.I think it's a waste of money.I go to blogs,and get what
I find interesting for free.I did get a free download when I bought that
limited version on the last Green Day.the three record version with the book of
art prints that sold for $90.00,but I don't count that.
I already have the card. So it's not a cost issue at this time. As
mentioned above, this question has been raised and discussed on the
net before. Most discussions tend to spiral into personal preference
discussions. I was looking for a more definative answer in actual
benefits or lack thereof to
True enough.
On Sep 9, 12:17 pm, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:48 AM, falst...@46 wrote:
Addressing the original question, you could use the older (at least a
g3) Macs to build a Mac Cluster. There have been universities and
government agencies
John Niven wrote:
I find this thread rather surprising. If you research the web, this used to
be a popular Mac question: should I buy the dual or the single? The answer
used to be that you would see no difference unless you were using one of the
few multiple processor aware apps (i.e.
Is it possible to install Classic onto a Mac that is already running
Tiger? I need this old iMac (front loading CD) to run a few older
applications.
When I try to use the OS 9.2.2 installation disk, I hit a dead end.
The Mac wants an OS 9 System Folder to launch the installer
Do I have
On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
When I try to use the OS 9.2.2 installation disk, I hit a dead end.
The Mac wants an OS 9 System Folder to launch the installer
Assuming the OS 9 drivers were installed when the HD was initially
partitioned, you should be able to
I would actually like to take issue that the Mac OS did not support
multi processors. I seem to remember several machines that were multi
processor from the 603e era, including one with 4 processors, if
memory serves, made by one of the clone manufacturers and I believe
the 8600 and 9600 were
I saw there was new iTunes 9 available today, and thought I'd update.
I ran Software Update on my G5 and was offered QuickTime 7.6.4 instead.
I ran Software Update and upon reboot things seemed normal, but upon
the final Desktop screen a couple login itemsstartup applications
immediately
A few days ago. there was an offer of a 1.8GHz card for a G4 as I have in use
at this present moment,
It went up to over € 250 (300 $US) - a G5 could be purchased for that (nearly).
for the price of a faster dual processor upgrade card, you could buy a way
way way faster dual g5.
-Jonas
On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:04 PM, falst...@46 wrote:
I would actually like to take issue that the Mac OS did not support
multi processors. I seem to remember several machines that were multi
processor from the 603e era, including one with 4 processors, if
memory serves, made by one of the clone
I think many computers run 'Tiger' and a classic 9.2.2 (my G4 and a G3 do),
and I recommend installing the 'X' on a different drive than the 'Classic'.
If you're using an iMac (a single drive system), there'll be problems.
And there has been the advice (by Apple) firstly to install 9, update
That was my point. Apple DID make multiprocesser Macs BEFORE they had an OS
that would use them, which is why this single/dual question was previously
subjective. It depended on what apps you were going to use.
OSX changed that.
--- On Wed, 9/9/09, falst...@46 paulall...@cox.net wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:33 PM, John Niven wrote:
That was my point. Apple DID make multiprocesser Macs BEFORE they
had an OS that would use them, which is why this single/dual
question was previously subjective. It depended on what apps you
were going to use.
OSX changed that.
Sorry for the typo enyway'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml
I am considering buying a Dell to run leopard on, and am wondering how a 2
or 2.8GHZ intel single processor would perform vs a mdd dp 1GHZ ppc. thanks
-Jonas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those
Well, I can tell you that my 1.42 Dual MDD (with bad L3 cache!) runs
slightly faster than a Hackintoshed Dell P4 machine running at 2.6ghz,
and is much more responsive overall. If you're going the Hackintosh
route, go dual-core intel, I suggest a Pentium Dual Core or Core 2
Duo. Either
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Guess I need to temporarily bypass the DSL connection, hook up the
modem, and FAX away using OS Xs pdf to fax capability before/after
creating a pdf ... thanks.
No you shouldn't need to
At 9:42 PM -0400 9/9/09, Bill Connelly wrote:
Thanks All.
Worked like a charm from my Yikes! OCd 450MHz under Tiger 10.4.11.
TextEdit Print Fax PDF after creating an Address Book entry.
Take That The Hartford in Lexington, KY!
I love how they tell you they have to take a fax as it's more
This is completely off topic on the G List and this thread is closed.
Len Gerstel
List Nanny
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on
I just updated to iTunes 9 on my dual 1.42 MDD G4, and I'm having some
problems with it.
I keep seeing the beach ball, but iTunes is the only app I have
running besides Mail and IRC.
When I try and click the Movies tab for my iPod touch, it crashes and
must be force quit.
Anyone else having
OK, I got the two new drives today, replaced my dead internal drive
with one of them, and used Time Machine to restore the contents of the
dead drive to the new one. I was successful, but only on the second
try. I didn't do it the right way the first time around, I guess.
The first time I tried
On 9/9/09 10:29 PM, Chance Reecher of cnrtechh...@gmail.com sent
I just updated to iTunes 9 on my dual 1.42 MDD G4, and I'm having some
problems with it.
I keep seeing the beach ball, but iTunes is the only app I have
running besides Mail and IRC.
When I try and click the Movies tab for
At 11:30 AM -0700 9/9/2009, John Niven wrote:
I find this thread rather surprising. If you research the web, this
used to be a popular Mac question: should I buy the dual or the
single?
[snip]
and it maxed out BOTH cpu bars. So I rather fancy that I'd prefer a
slower dual than a faster single.
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:16 PM, Fabian Fang wrote:
I have several copies of Mac OS 9 Install Disc (Apple Number
2Z691-5721-A) for the express purpose of installing 9.2.2 Classic
Support onto PowerPC Macs running Panther/Tiger.
These Classic install discs are missing a lot of the extensions
At 11:24 PM +0200 9/9/2009, WhyOSX wrote:
I think many computers run 'Tiger' and a classic 9.2.2 (my G4 and a G3 do),
and I recommend installing the 'X' on a different drive than the 'Classic'.
If you're using an iMac (a single drive system), there'll be problems.
Mac OS X 10.0 thru 10.4 are
It's likely that it's running the genius scan and the gapless scan. I
have to tell iTunes to cut the crap every ten minutes.
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 9/9/09 10:29 PM, Chance Reecher of cnrtechh...@gmail.com sent
I just updated to
Got myself a stick of RAM that I wonder what Macs it might work in
256 MB, DDR, 266MHz, CL2.5
PC2100U-25330-Z
--
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036
The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind;
to go forth and claim our place in outer space.
- Capt.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Tom tba...@nmia.com wrote:
But I'm going to keep those five
year warranty papers handy
I've never replaced a drive under warranty so I may have this wrong.
But the impression I got from poking around drive manufacturer web
sites is that they all base the
Thanks John, but in this case it's pretty easy to tell when these
drives were made; they both have July 2009 printed right on them, in
big red letters! (Must be something new?).
Tom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are a member of
On 9/9/09 11:50 PM, Stephen Conrad of khel...@gmail.com sent
Got myself a stick of RAM that I wonder what Macs it might work in
256 MB, DDR, 266MHz, CL2.5
PC2100U-25330-Z
Off the top of my head, the MDD G4s, 867MHz/DP.
Best regards,
Dana
How is that off topic? It involves a G4 PPC machine, and is simply
comparing the speed of that machine to an intel mac or hack.
-Jonas
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote:
This is completely off topic on the G List and this thread is closed.
Len Gerstel
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:47 PM, diane wrote:
At 9:42 PM -0400 9/9/09, Bill Connelly wrote:
Thanks All.
Worked like a charm from my Yikes! OCd 450MHz under Tiger 10.4.11.
TextEdit Print Fax PDF after creating an Address Book entry.
Take That The Hartford in Lexington, KY!
I love how
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Tom tba...@nmia.com wrote:
Thanks John, but in this case it's pretty easy to tell when these
drives were made; they both have July 2009 printed right on them, in
big red letters! (Must be something new?).
Yes, that works too. :-)
The point I had in the back
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Got myself a stick of RAM that I wonder what Macs it might work in
256 MB, DDR, 266MHz, CL2.5
PC2100U-25330-Z
You can download MacTracker for free, and then look in the Memory
section to see which models use PC2100. Some Macs require low
On Sep 9, 2:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The apps are not dual processor aware. Most apps are. Even VLC
player is and will split the load across the 2 processors of a dual.
2) You are not doing anything with these systems while the apps are
running. Since they do not
56 matches
Mail list logo
