finally found a way to lose weight that works and is actually healthy
for you! let me know if you have any questions
about it.
Question: Would you please take some more of that berry stuff?
I mean, just enough to get to weight 0.
--
You received this message because you are a member of
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:52 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the documents
and then email them, which I would think would nearly always be the preferred
solution.
Legally speaking, possessing faxed documents with a signature are usually
Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the
documents and then email them, which I would think would nearly always
be the preferred solution.
Legally speaking, possessing faxed documents with a signature are usually
considered the same as possessing the original;
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:42 PM, peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
The law is a conservative, slow-moving, ponderous luddite at times.
Indeed so.
I don't believe a FAX is necessary unless the transactions are
unilateral, meaning the parties involved don't have a prior written
agreement to abide by
On 2011/04/04 21:52, Kris Tilford wrote:
Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the
documents and then email them, which I would think would nearly always
be the preferred solution.
When I purchased my NOS (New Old Stock) Power Mac G5 in February of
2008, I could not
On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
It appears that for one off legal transactions, using a FAX machine is
easier than getting a valid signed written agreement prior to the electronic
transaction.
Precisely. Also, (and hopefully) one of the outcomes of the current mortgage
Sorry. This is wrong.
A dual processor card from a Gigabit Ethernet won't fit *physically* into
a
Digitial Audio/Quicksilver/Quicksilver 2002. It is mirrored in its design
– it
would extend towards the memory banks and overlap them, hence won't be
fittable
at all (even though the
Hi!
Merely out of confusion:
Will a Dual-1GHz G4 processor card, which obviously comes from a QS2002, work
in an original QS from 2001?
I ask because I've read an item description on eBay once stating that the
Dual-800 is the highest usable stock processor for the original QS. The seller
- Original Message
From: Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
.
At issue in many of these cases is an assured chain of physical handling:
something sent via email can be intercepted and changed in transmission; a
fax
cannot.
Well, sort of -- certainly in the
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers [CORRECTION]
Date:Tuesday, 05. April 2011
From:peterh...@cruzio.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Giga-Designs carefully worked around the physical and electrical
differences,
BUT… before I can do that, I need to know for sure if the Dual-1 GHz
QS2002
has any issues in a QS2001.
Because otherwise (both cases) I'll have to wipe the dream of 2×1 GHz out
of
my mind…
Any QS 2001 proc will work in a QS 2002.
Any QS 2002 proc will work in a QS 2001.
Actually, the
Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use the
full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac OS 10.5
sees it as a 128 GB drive. I know this has nothing to do with the thread. But
good info none the less.
Actually, the only significant
Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use
the full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac
OS 10.5 sees it as a 128 GB drive. I know this has nothing to do with the
thread. But good info none the less.
MacOS X is pretty blind. It is
Il giorno 6-04-2011 1:42, peterh...@cruzio.com ha scritto:
Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use
the full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac
OS 10.5 sees it as a 128 GB drive.
Woah! :-o
So it isn't an hardware limitation (as I
14 matches
Mail list logo
