Il giorno 8-10-2011 23:21, Joshua Juran ha scritto:
Yup, the enormous 512x512 icons didn't ship until 10.5 Leopard
Yeah, I was suspecting that. :-)
I just chose Show Package Contents from the contextual menu, found
Contents/Resources/TextEdit.icns, and opened it (in Preview).
Good idea.
In my
Den Søndag, 9/10 2011, 01:55, Clark Martin skrev:
Attaching 2 or more computers to one drive won't physically hurt the
firewire interface but it may corrupt the drive. Each computer will mount
the drive and there is nothing to keep them from writing contradictory
directory information to
Attaching 2 or more computers to one drive won't physically hurt the
firewire interface but it may corrupt the drive. Each computer
will mount
the drive and there is nothing to keep them from writing
contradictory
directory information to the disk. So don't do it.
too bad, sounded like
At 1:40 AM +0200 10/9/2011, t...@nehaia.dk wrote:
lacie back up drive with 3 firewire ports on the back
[snip]
wondering if I could just hook those two up to the drive as well?
No.
Multiple computer devices on an i/o bus (scsi, firewire, usb, etc),
are not supported by OS X or the HFS+ file
Den Søndag, 9/10 2011, 10:49, Dan skrev:
At 5:59 PM +0200 10/9/2011, t...@nehaia.dk wrote:
what other ways to use the same back up drive for two puters exists then?
CarbonCopyCloner will back up to afp shared volumes, be they NAS or
on another computer.
hey, lots of interesting info and
On Oct 9, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Dan wrote:
Locking was done at the record, block, and file level. Very cool. Very
disappointing that this type of high reliability file system went the way of
the dodo, except for enterprise Unix solutions. It's something that I think
OS X should have had
On Oct 9, 2011, at 2:09 PM, t...@nehaia.dk wrote:
maybe a stupid question, but I never succeded in accessing the old
g3 from
10.4 or 10.5 - I can only do it the other way around - i.e., I can
access
the 10.x macs from 9.2.2, but not the 9.2.2 from 10.x
Sometimes I use HTTP to transfer
On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Bruce Ryan wrote:
Attaching 2 or more computers to one drive won't physically hurt the
firewire interface but it may corrupt the drive. Each computer will mount
the drive and there is nothing to keep them from writing contradictory
directory information to the
At 3:14 PM -0700 10/9/2011, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Oct 9, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Dan wrote:
Locking was done at the record, block, and file level. Very cool.
Very disappointing that this type of high reliability file system
went the way of the dodo, except for enterprise Unix solutions.
It's
another thing about this...
so why would I like to daisy-chain some other devices to the drive on the
other fw ports?
the manual says I can, but I just can't find a reason to do so
what devices and why - anyone?
tia
/tina
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a
Maybe I don't know enough to recognize the problem, but I use one
drive for multiple G4 computers running Mac OS 9.2.2 all the time.
One G4 computer is used as a Server to which the drive is physically
connected by firewire or USB.
Then several G4 computers and multiple LaserWriter 16/600
Wow, listening to ABC you'd think the Apple ][ was a creation solely by
Steve Jobs. O yes, his funeral was already held and Apple has said there
will not be a public memorial.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jonas Lopez jonaslo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apple Inc. to ENGRAVE THE BACK OF THE iPHONE 5
I am using FreeNas 8 on a Pentium 4 computer that was no longer in use and I
can store files from Windows, Mac, Linux and Unix if I want and it is easy
to connect to from any computer. Running for 3 months and has been great so
far. I plan on getting an ATOM board in the future for lower power
On Oct 9, 2011, at 11:59 AM, t...@nehaia.dk wrote:
well, what other ways to use the same back up drive for two puters
exists
then?
tia
/tina
How about the obvious Network the two computers and make the
attached drive a 'network resource?
Chuck D.
--
You received this message
Il giorno 10-10-2011 2:39, t...@nehaia.dk ha scritto:
so why would I like to daisy-chain some other devices to the drive on the
other fw ports?
the manual says I can, but I just can't find a reason to do so
What if you have several FW devices and, say, just one available FW port on
the
15 matches
Mail list logo
