On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are the
current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the G-Group to
join our Leopard Group to seek or provide assistance.
Sorry to continue the
On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow
Leopard are the current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for
members of the G-Group to join our Leopard Group to seek or
On 2011/02/23 10:06, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
If I were king of the forest, all these myriad LEM lists would be
reduced to a handful:
68K Macs (both laptop and desktops, because these are waaay obsolete
by now.) OldWorld Macs (PowerPC old world machines, both laptops and
desktops as
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are
the current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the
G-Group to join our Leopard Group to seek
I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my inbox
up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
Is 'forum' a dirty word in LEM land?
Jonathan
--
You received this message because you are a
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote:
I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my inbox
up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
Is 'forum' a dirty word in LEM land?
I
On 2011/02/23 10:36, Jonathan Smith so eloquently wrote:
I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my
inbox up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
I use filters to sort them into the
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Sorry to continue the meta-discussion, but I'd really like to add my
2 cents.
Please note that, in the above subject line, my message was in
response to a request for explanation of the posting problem to our
Leopard Group. For other
At 10:12 AM -0800 2/23/2011, Fabian Fang wrote:
I have no knowledge as to whether the LEM Group Owner reads messages
on the G-Group, or any other group. He is the sole Decider with
respect to setting up LEM Groups. Over the years, on our internal
lemnannies group, there have been discussions
At 10:06 AM -0700 2/23/2011, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Sorry to continue the meta-discussion, but I'd really like to add my 2 cents.
Um, yea. My 2 cents also: what Bruce said.
If I were king of the forest, all these myriad LEM lists would be
reduced to a handful:
68K Macs (both laptop and
I'd even cut it some more but that's a great start!
1. 68K of all flavors
2. Pre G Power Macs of all flavors
3. G Power Macs of all flavors
4. Intel Macs of all flavors
5. Software group maybe
Consolidation always results in greater efficiencies.
After spending a good part of my
Previously, at 10:06 AM -0700 2/23/11, as Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are the
current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the G-Group to
join
our
12 matches
Mail list logo
