Re: Time Machine/Capsule (was: Adding New HD)

2008-10-29 Thread Dan
At 4:13 PM -0400 10/28/2008, Al Poulin wrote: Are the TM and TC less prone to problems in a home environment than in the office with multiple users? Doubtful. The issue is bugs in TM. Time Machine is just, IMO, not fully baked yet. Good to play with but until it's totally dependable, your

Re: Time Machine/Capsule (was: Adding New HD)

2008-10-28 Thread Al Poulin
Thank you Bruce and Dan. So TM/C, both of them, are mixed blessings, best summarized as flakey. On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:20 AM, g3-5-list group wrote: == 3 of 3 == Date: Mon, Oct 27 2008 5:09 pm From: Dan 0. TM spins violently if stopped suddenly. This leaves you quite vulnerable to

Re: Time Machine/Capsule (was: Adding New HD)

2008-10-28 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Al Poulin wrote: Thank you Bruce and Dan. So TM/C, both of them, are mixed blessings, best summarized as flakey. On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:20 AM, g3-5-list group wrote: == 3 of 3 == Date: Mon, Oct 27 2008 5:09 pm From: Dan 0. TM spins violently if stopped

Time Machine/Capsule (was: Adding New HD)

2008-10-27 Thread Al Poulin
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:44 AM, g3-5-list group wrote: == 6 of 6 == Date: Sun, Oct 26 2008 7:37 pm From: Dan Let Time Machine use the other volume. And when it farks up, you can wipe it out and still have that other volume as your primary backup. Maybe sometime Time Machine will be ready

Re: Time Machine/Capsule (was: Adding New HD)

2008-10-27 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Al Poulin wrote: On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:44 AM, g3-5-list group wrote: == 6 of 6 == Date: Sun, Oct 26 2008 7:37 pm From: Dan Let Time Machine use the other volume. And when it farks up, you can wipe it out and still have that other volume as your primary