Sorry Alex, I was refering to the fact that MS has some 90+% of the business
and military market based upon the programs running that are owned as the
creator by MS.
So as to have been a fly on the wall in Apples core meetings, it was clear that
the way to increase market is to change chip set
On May 13, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Ralph Green wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:46 -0700, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>> On May 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ralph Green wrote:
>>
>>> I called Apple hardware treacherous. I did not come up with
>>> that term. It is widely used,
>>
>> No it isn't because you're t
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:46 -0700, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> On May 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ralph Green wrote:
>
> > I called Apple hardware treacherous. I did not come up with
> > that term. It is widely used,
>
> No it isn't because you're the only person I've ever read or heard making
> that c
>> I believe he's referring to TPM, not EFI. My understanding of TPM is
>> that it's a set of cryptographic keys that prevents software from
>> running on any "untrusted" system (meaning, "unapproved" hardware).
Quite a few generic motherboard now have TPM, either on-board, or
available in a plug
On May 13, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
> On May 13, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> If you believe that EFI is some great conspiracy to prevent you from running
>> another OS on a Mac it is YOU who doesn't understand what EFI is.
>
> I believe he's referring to TPM, not E
I highly doubt that Apple actually decides that your Mac can run Linux or not.
I have run Solaris, many different Linux distros, Winders, and Mac OS X (even
the Lion Beta). I don't think Apple would waste money telling the devs to let
TPM know that stuff like OpenSUSE is "trusted".
--
You rece
Bruce,
EFI is fine. BIOS had major problems, since it runs in real mode. It
is TPM that is the problem. Apple certainly used TPM on their early x86
hardware. If they have removed it, that is a good thing. I will have
to search for some real evidence on that matter.
Ralph
On Fri, 2011-05-13
Il giorno 13-05-2011 22:01, Kris Tilford ha scritto:
> I believe he's referring to TPM, not EFI. My understanding of TPM is
> that it's a set of cryptographic keys that prevents software from
> running on any "untrusted" system (meaning, "unapproved" hardware).
AFAIK, is rather the opposite: the "
On May 13, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
If you believe that EFI is some great conspiracy to prevent you from
running another OS on a Mac it is YOU who doesn't understand what
EFI is.
I believe he's referring to TPM, not EFI. My understanding of TPM is
that it's a set of cryptogr
Il giorno 13-05-2011 20:29, Jonas Lopez ha scritto:
> soon you will find Apple programs that are far superior to Microsoft
Soon?
This has ALWAYS been true. :-D
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particu
That already happened. I have found that iMovie is superior to WMM and iWork is
far, far superior to M$ Office (even AppleWorks is better).
On May 13, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> As Apple moves into bigger market share, soon you will find Apple programs
> that are far superior to
What kinda of files are you trying to burn in iTunes? Also the drivers might
need a upgrade for your device.
Sent from my iPod
On May 7, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Baldassare Guzzo wrote:
> PM G4 933 10.4.11 iTunes 9.2.1
>
> Hi everyone. iTunes plays fine but if I go to burn a cd, I get "The
> a
What is going on here is the long known fact that Microsoft is a SOFTWARE
company not a hardware company and Apple is BOTH SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE company.
You sure can be sure that Apple has NO INTENTION of letting ANY of its software
run on all this hardware that IS NOT APPLE and that Apple did
On May 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ralph Green wrote:
> I called Apple hardware treacherous. I did not come up with
> that term. It is widely used,
No it isn't because you're the only person I've ever read or heard making that
claim.
> because Apple sells hardware that obeys
> Apple and not the
Thanks Bruce - it is working just fine on OS9, I was just seeing if
there was a 'fix' to pop this thing into a window in OS-X, and it
doesn't look like it is possible. National Instruments does provide a
developers toolkit, so one could I guess in theory write one, but it's
probably not worth the
On May 12, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Ralph Green wrote:
> but the fact that Apple releases enablers to allow other operating
> systems to run seems to indicate that the TPM is really there and
> implemented.
Apple releases Windows drivers for it's hardware, not 'enablers for other
operating systems'
16 matches
Mail list logo
