Is it true that you have to have SL to do the upgrade? I didn't see this as
a requirement on Apple's site though they only have instructions for
upgrading from SL, no other OS is mentioned. Somehow I missed that tidbit in
the hoopla.
Thanks,
Diane
--
You received this message because you are a
Is it true that you have to have SL to do the upgrade?
No, it is NOT true.
And NO, it is NOT an upgrade, it it actually an installer onto 10.6.8, and
it can be made into a true installer, and ... indeed ... an installer
which needs no other OS of any kind in order to install Lion onto a target
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:30 AM, diane wrote:
s it true that you have to have SL to do the upgrade? I didn't see this as
a requirement on Apple's site though they only have instructions for
upgrading from SL, no other OS is mentioned. Somehow I missed that tidbit in
the hoopla.
Yes and no. As
On 8/4/11 1:55 PM, peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
Is it true that you have to have SL to do the upgrade?
No, it is NOT true.
And NO, it is NOT an upgrade, it it actually an installer onto 10.6.8, and
it can be made into a true installer, and ... indeed ... an installer
which needs no other OS of
On Aug 4, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Mark wrote:
Are these other processors you mention what would be in an old MacBook Pro?
No they're specific Intel chipsets on generic PeeCees. Lion requires a Core 2
Duo processor or better, excluding the first gen MBP's with their core Duo
cpus, which are 32-bit
Are these other processors you mention what would be in an old MacBook
Pro?
No they're specific Intel chipsets on generic PeeCees. Lion requires a
Core 2 Duo processor or better, excluding the first gen MBP's with their
core Duo cpus, which are 32-bit only. Lion is strictly 64 bit..
Until
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Tina K. wrote:
Meaning the OS is 100% 64 bit, or the OS and Apps are 100% 64 bit?
I don't think so, but I'm still confused upon this issue? Would
someone clarify please?
I'd thought that Lion was supposed to be 100% 64-bit, and since my
hackintosh laptop (as
Lion is strictly 64 bit..
Meaning the OS is 100% 64 bit, or the OS and Apps are 100% 64 bit?
Lion is intended to be 64-bit, but only the Finder MUST run in 64-bit. The
kernel is 32-/64-bit as is almost everything else (except the Finder).
You may boot Lion into 32-bit (arch=i386, in the boot
At 8:13 PM -0500 8/4/2011, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Tina K. wrote:
Meaning the OS is 100% 64 bit, or the OS and Apps are 100% 64 bit?
I don't think so, but I'm still confused upon this issue? Would
someone clarify please?
[Moved from below for clarity]
When booted
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:00 PM, peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
Lion is intended to be 64-bit, but only the Finder MUST run in 64-
bit. The
kernel is 32-/64-bit as is almost everything else (except the Finder).
You may boot Lion into 32-bit (arch=i386, in the boot loader's boot
flags), but the
At 10:12 PM -0400 8/4/2011, Dan wrote:
As distributed, there's a file missing that tells Lion it can boot
on 32-bit hardware -- hence Apple's claim that you need a Core 2 or
better processor. Add that file back and it works... this was
discovered by the hackintosh crowd during the seeding
At 7:38 PM -0700 8/4/2011, Joshua Juran wrote:
Has anyone seen the Finder using even 1 GB of virtual memory, let
alone exceeding the 4 GB limit that necessitates 64-bit pointers?
No. Nothing I've tried makes it suck up anything near that much. I
think my peak so far is around 420 MB. And
On 11-08-04 1:30 PM, diane dianed...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it true that you have to have SL to do the upgrade? I didn't see this as a
requirement on Apple's site though they only have instructions for upgrading
from SL, no other OS is mentioned. Somehow I missed that tidbit in the hoopla.
13 matches
Mail list logo
