On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Tina K. wrote:
> On 2010/11/29 09:09, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
>> Not even remotely true. Significant speed improvements were made in
>> 10.5 and 10.6. For example, Spotlight is actually useful in 10.5.
>
> At the cost of Finder search which Apple destroyed
On 2010/11/29 09:09, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
Not even remotely true. Significant speed improvements were made in
10.5 and 10.6. For example, Spotlight is actually useful in 10.5.
At the cost of Finder search which Apple destroyed. I prefer to search a
location rather than a drive, t
On Nov 29, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Geke wrote:
> You already found out, but anyway:
> Apple has been replacing emulation code by native code up to Tiger,
> and that’s the fastest OS X of all. In later versions, additions have
> started to make things slower again.
Not even remotely true. Significant s
> Tiger is smoother, as you told me
> thank you
You already found out, but anyway:
Apple has been replacing emulation code by native code up to Tiger,
and that’s the fastest OS X of all. In later versions, additions have
started to make things slower again.
Also, a lot of software requires a mini
> IMHO Tiger is the smoothest, best optimized version of OS X. Snow
> Leopard may be as good or better but I've never used it and you can't
> use it either on your iMac.
>
Tiger is smoother, as you told me
thank you
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
On 2010/11/25 21:25, Mullin9 so eloquently wrote:
iMac G4 800, one that is made in 2002, it came with Mac OS 10.2.4
it have 256 MB RAM, I added 512 MB RAM
for the Total of 768 MB RAM.
Should I use OS X.3 Panther (32 bit), the one that i already have.
or X.4.11 Tiger (64 bit)?
IMHO Tiger is th
I would upgrade to 10.4. It has way more features and I doubt it will
be that much slower. I am currently installing tiger on that exact
machine. I will let you know how it does.
-Jonas
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desk
I would upgrade to 10.4. It has way more features and I doubt it will
be that much slower. I am currently installing tiger on that exact
machine. I will let you know how it does.
-Jonas
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desk
Nov 2010 20:31:08
To: G-Group
Reply-To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: iMac G4 800, OS X Panther vs Tiger
Tiger have more features, but i find my G4 800 to be more responsive
with 10.3 Panther, than with Tiger
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
Tiger have more features, but i find my G4 800 to be more responsive
with 10.3 Panther, than with Tiger
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendm
iMac G4 800, one that is made in 2002, it came with Mac OS 10.2.4
it have 256 MB RAM, I added 512 MB RAM
for the Total of 768 MB RAM.
Should I use OS X.3 Panther (32 bit), the one that i already have.
or X.4.11 Tiger (64 bit)?
Tiger came in the G5 (64 Bit) era. whereas
Panther came in later G4 (32
11 matches
Mail list logo
