To finish off this thread (at least the title topic) and for the
record:
-The Digital Audio's 466MHz does fit -- as is -- into the Gigabit. So
no soldering needed there, it's not even too tight.
-The processor runs at 350MHz, just as Len predicted.
However, I can't get the Sonnet card to work in
On Aug 10, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Geke wrote:
To finish off this thread (at least the title topic) and for the
record:
-The Digital Audio's 466MHz does fit -- as is -- into the Gigabit. So
no soldering needed there, it's not even too tight.
Did not know that. My warning was based upon QS
On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Chance Reecher wrote:
Erm... I have to disagree with that.
I put 10.5 on my mom's P4 Dell with a 2.8GHz CPU and 1GB of RAM.
It's way more responsive than my 1GHz single MDD and about equal to
my dual 1GHz MDD.
And... flash video is actually watchable and
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Chance Reecher wrote:
Erm... I have to disagree with that.
I put 10.5 on my mom's P4 Dell with a 2.8GHz CPU and 1GB of RAM. It's way
more responsive than my 1GHz single MDD and about equal to
Thanks everyone for the great response.
The soldering Len mentioned was enough for me to forget about the
option of putting the DA's processor into the Gigabit.
And then, today I discovered that original 400MHz processors for the
Gigabit can be found on ebay for less than 15$, so I decided to
I just got a Gigabit with a Sonnet Encore ST/G4 1GHz processor upgrade
inside.
Now I want to swap that Sonnet with the 466MHz cpu in my Digital
Audio, but before I do that, I wanted to check two things here:
1. How tricky is it to put the DA's CPU into the Gigabit? The CPU is
the same, but I read
On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Geke wrote:
I just got a Gigabit with a Sonnet Encore ST/G4 1GHz processor upgrade
inside.
Now I want to swap that Sonnet with the 466MHz cpu in my Digital
Audio, but before I do that, I wanted to check two things here:
1. How tricky is it to put the DA's CPU into
On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Geke wrote:
- Does the slower ATA bus speed of the Gigabit make a big difference
in actual practice?
I seem to remember someone saying, that the System Bus speed bump from
100 to 133 was significant, but that after that (167?) folks didn't
see much
On Aug 6, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Geke wrote:
1. How tricky is it to put the DA's CPU into the Gigabit? The CPU is
the same, but I read that the location of the CPU card on machines
previous to the digital audio would require some modifications to the
motherboard/case.
(The other way I can manage; I
I can't agree with that. A P4 is the definition of hype verses
performance. My G4 933 mhz Quicksilver is more responsive then a P4
at twice the clock speed and the ram is PC133 on my QS and it is still
the better machine. P4s were not even that great with windows. Plus
a P4 is basically a
On 8/6/2010 3:14 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
I can't agree with that. A P4 is the definition of hype verses
performance. My G4 933 mhz Quicksilver is more responsive then a P4
at twice the clock speed and the ram is PC133 on my QS and it is still
the better machine. P4s were not even that
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Brown jason_brown1...@att.netwrote:
On 8/6/2010 3:14 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
I can't agree with that. A P4 is the definition of hype verses
performance. My G4 933 mhz Quicksilver is more responsive then a P4
at twice the clock speed and the ram is
12 matches
Mail list logo
