Yavor Doganov wrote:
> | Released under the BSD license.
>
> This is very ambiguous, since there are many BSD licenses, and I
> believe it is not a valid copyright notice, as it fails to specify the
> precise license, and fails the supposed-to-be-BSD license requirement
> to include the full notic
At Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:43:10 +0200,
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
>
> Ok we'll fixe all that as described in the ticket you opened.
Thanks, it looks that you've already done that in SVN trunk (apart
from the images/sounds).
BTW, I also noticed some files of borrowed code which contained
| Released un
Hello
I have corrected some problems and updated all the file headers.
Can you check the SVN branch?
Normally, I just have to add a license to images and it will be correct.
regards,
roidelapluie
2008/8/14 Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> These files are under "GPLv2 only":
>
> scripts/ga
Yann Leboulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed it is a problem, but one of our previous dev don't want to
> release under GPLv3+ (some of his code is still in Gajim: optparser)
Then we need to rewrite it. :/
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Yavor Doganov wrote:
These files are under "GPLv2 only":
[...]
This is not allowed, as their license is incompatible with the license
of the package as a whole.
These files do not have copyright notices:
[...]
To release a project unambiguously under the GPL, all non-trivial
files (usua
These files are under "GPLv2 only":
scripts/gajim.in
scripts/gajim-remote.in
src/lastfm_track_listener.py
This is not allowed, as their license is incompatible with the license
of the package as a whole.
These files do not have copyright notices:
src/groups.py
src/gtkspellmodule.c
src/negotiati
