Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-02 Thread Yann Leboulanger
On 11/02/2014 07:06 AM, Genghis Khan wrote: > > Perhaps realising built-in features into plugins like Liferea 1.11.x > and MOC 2.7 http://moc.daper.net/node/1217 or overhaul code cleaning, > polishing, tightening and upgrading like MOC 2.6. > > For example, since systray is considered as legacy,

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Genghis Khan
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:20:57 +0100 Yann Leboulanger wrote: > Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : > > Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: > >> Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes > >> in GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... > >

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Andrew Diederich
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Yann Leboulanger wrote: > > > That's already a big big work. It has been started and Gajim is usable > with GTK3. But it needs a lot of love before it's releasable. > We'll probably do a release once it's done. So that's the main thing on > the timeline. > > That ki

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Le 01/11/2014 16:09, Josef Kufner a écrit : > > Hmm... you are right. Soe one thing on the list is port to Gtk3. > What else? That's already a big big work. It has been started and Gajim is usable with GTK3. But it needs a lot of love before it's releasable. We'll probably do a release once it's d

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 1 November 2014 14:07, Yann Leboulanger wrote: > Le 01/11/2014 14:04, Josef Kufner a écrit : >> Good morning everyone, >> Gajim is very old and still has version zero.something, which means >> Gajim is unstable and incomplete. > > Thanks for your comment about the stability of Gajim. Could you

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Josef Kufner
Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:20: > Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : >> Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: >>> Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in >>> GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... >> >> Well, that should

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : > Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: >> Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in >> GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... > > Well, that should be 2.0. The 1.0 should be before such big change.

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Josef Kufner
Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: > Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in > GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... Well, that should be 2.0. The 1.0 should be before such big change. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Le 01/11/2014 14:04, Josef Kufner a écrit : > Good morning everyone, > Gajim is very old and still has version zero.something, which means > Gajim is unstable and incomplete. The first part is not true for very > long time, and the second... what is missing to version 1.0 ? > > If there is somethin