Ahh... missed that. Sorry (and thanks for putting together the page :)
). It seems like we are on the same page - I have created a Trello
card for 'stronger' toolbox filters.
https://trello.com/c/Sg8D2PBj
It occurs to me there may another way to accomplish admin tool
functionality - and in an
I'm running the stable copy of galaxy and noticed that some custom,
administrative tools (and otherwise tools which should be restricted in
access due to licensing/etc.) were showing up in normal user's toolboxes
inside the workflow editor.
I feel that this is a bug, as the tool filters should be
This sounds like a bug; the primary toolbox and workflow editor toolbox
should reflect the same set of tools (exception being workflow-specific
control steps, etc). I've created a trello card to track this issue here:
https://trello.com/c/3TxFHkYR
That said, do note the warning on the dynamic
Okay, thanks for confirming and creating the card.
Yes...it's unfortunate that tool filters will not block tools entirely,
but this will get it out of the users' view in one more place.
On 12/17/2013 05:39 PM, Dannon Baker wrote:
This sounds like a bug; the primary toolbox and workflow editor
Agreed with Dannon, it is a bug that they are showing up in the workflow
editor but in general toolbox filters are not meant as a security mechanism.
You can block access to running specific tools (filtered or not) using
dynamic job destinations. (Under dynamic job destinations documentation (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
I've been using the dynamic jobs and they've been working beautifully!
(For context, I wrote the initial revision of the Access Control page
based off of my readings and experiences setting it up in galaxy).
I, for one, would be in favour of
