Re: [galaxy-dev] BugFix for dynamic_options ParamValueFilter to run IUC SnpEff in a workflow

2014-03-18 Thread John Chilton
Hey JJ, Thanks for the bug report. I can confirm the issue. I think the problem probably is that the other_values thing you are printing out there is very different when rendering tools (it is the value of things at that depth of the tool state tree) versus workflows (in which it is the global

Re: [galaxy-dev] BugFix for dynamic_options ParamValueFilter to run IUC SnpEff in a workflow

2014-03-18 Thread Jim Johnson
Nice work John. This fixed issues for running workflows for both SnpEff and XYPlot. Please reject my pull requests : #336 and #343 in favor of #349 Thanks, JJ On 3/18/14, 11:44 AM, John Chilton wrote: Hey JJ, Thanks for the bug report. I can confirm the issue. I think the problem probably

[galaxy-dev] BugFix for dynamic_options ParamValueFilter to run IUC SnpEff in a workflow

2014-02-28 Thread Jim Johnson
The current code in: lib/galaxy/tools/parameters/dynamic_options.py only searches the top layer of the dict to find the dependency value. A fix is provide in pull request: #343: Need to traverse the other_value dict to find dependencies for ParamValueFilter