Re: [galaxy-dev] Gal-Cloudman AMI Fails
Awesome! Thanks On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Dannon Baker dannonba...@me.com wrote: John, I'm still working on figuring out who created the AMI you're running across (it isn't under the main Galaxy cloud account, see the '072133624695' in the name string), but for future reference we'll always keep the recommended AMI to use listed on usegalaxy.org/cloud. At this point, it's still ami-da58aab3 (861460482541/galaxy-cloudman-2011-03-22). -Dannon On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, John Major wrote: Hello GalFolks- I saw a new galaxy-cloudman AMI appear ( 072133624695/galaxy-cloudman-2012-02-26 ) and was interested in giving it a whirl. But when I tried to launch it got the following error: The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the architecture in the manifest for aki-407d9529 (i386) Is this a dev-AMI? Or should I be expecting this to run? Thanks- John ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
[galaxy-dev] Gal-Cloudman AMI Fails
Hello GalFolks- I saw a new galaxy-cloudman AMI appear ( 072133624695/galaxy-cloudman-2012-02-26 ) and was interested in giving it a whirl. But when I tried to launch it got the following error: The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the architecture in the manifest for aki-407d9529 (i386) Is this a dev-AMI? Or should I be expecting this to run? Thanks- John ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
Re: [galaxy-dev] Gal-Cloudman AMI Fails
John, I'm still working on figuring out who created the AMI you're running across (it isn't under the main Galaxy cloud account, see the '072133624695' in the name string), but for future reference we'll always keep the recommended AMI to use listed on usegalaxy.org/cloud. At this point, it's still ami-da58aab3 (861460482541/galaxy-cloudman-2011-03-22). -Dannon On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, John Major wrote: Hello GalFolks- I saw a new galaxy-cloudman AMI appear ( 072133624695/galaxy-cloudman-2012-02-26 ) and was interested in giving it a whirl. But when I tried to launch it got the following error: The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the architecture in the manifest for aki-407d9529 (i386) Is this a dev-AMI? Or should I be expecting this to run? Thanks- John ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
