Ira,
As part of your Proteomics Toolshed, are you thinking of making some
Protein databases available ? Latest UniProt/SwissProt (~ 250 MB) or
UniProt/TREMBl (~ 8GB) ? That could be very helpful for future Proteomics
tools we are developing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniProt
Also, could it
Hi Greg,
I'm not too sure of the best way to make these available (perhaps showing by
ignorance of the way Galaxy handles such databases in the genomics world).
We've got a set of commandline tools which support protk-toolshed
https://bitbucket.org/iracooke/protk
And included among these
Hi Greg,
I'm afraid to say I might have been a bit ahead of myself in asking you to
create that Proteomics category. We're almost ready to upload our tools, but
at the last minute we've discovered a bunch of issues we need to sort out.
I'm going away for Easter and won't be back until the
No worries, Ira - have a great Easter vacation!
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Ira Cooke wrote:
Hi Greg,
I'm afraid to say I might have been a bit ahead of myself in asking you to
create that Proteomics category. We're almost ready to upload our tools, but
at the last minute we've
Hello Ira,
I've added the category to the main tool shed. Thanks for the request and your
upcoming contributions!
Greg Von Kuster
On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Ira Cooke wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to add a suite of proteomics tools to the toolshed but there is
currently no suitable
Thanks Ira,
Just so you know, the Galaxy functional test framework now supports testing
installed tools if the repository tools include tests and test datasets are
included in the repository in a test-data subdirectory. Here is the relevant
section of the tool shed wiki describing this:
Thanks ... that would definitely be a good idea.
Well try to implement proper tests for all the tools.
Ira
On 30/03/2012, at 10:01 AM, Greg Von Kuster wrote:
Thanks Ira,
Just so you know, the Galaxy functional test framework now supports testing
installed tools if the repository tools
