Re: [galaxy-dev] Upload files from filesystem paths - backwards checkboxes

2011-03-11 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Glen Beane glen.be...@jax.org wrote:

 On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Peter Cock wrote:

 Hi all,

 Via the Galaxy admin interface, I'm currently importing some BAM
 files into a library from the local file system. Since they are big, I
 don't want Galaxy to copy them.

 So I looked at the Copy data into Galaxy? option and made
 sure it wasn't ticked. Galaxy did copy the file :(

 I looked at the interface again, and see you have:

 Copy data into Galaxy?
 [check box] No
 Normally data uploaded with this tool is copied into Galaxy's files
 directory so any later changes to the data will not affect Galaxy.
 However, this may not be desired (especially for large NGS
 datasets), so use of this option will force Galaxy to always
 read the data from its original path.

 You've got a tick box labelled No so it does the opposite to the
 question above it. That is a HORRIBLE interface. I can't be the
 first person to be tricked by it, can I?

 I had a co-worker mess this up too.  I thought this was a poor design
 decision.  I thought maybe yes/no radio options would work.
  Copy data into galaxy? yes(*) no( )

 I would urge you to remove the work No and flip the meaning
 (and default) to match. But that could confuse existing admin
 users used to clicking from previous habit.

 How about making it a select parameter instead, with options
 Copy files (default) and Link to files which is very explicit?

 I think this would be better than the current no check box,  and
 more explicit than my yes(*) no () radio buttons


You may be right, but switching from a checkbox to a select
isn't as easy as it could be... at least not with my familiarity
with the code base.

 Likewise for the Preserve directory structure? setting, I'd
 remove the No caption and flip the setting, or just replace
 the backwards tick box with a select parameter offering
 Preserve directory structure and Place in selected folder
 (or something like that).

 Pretty please? How about if I write and test the patch?


Patch for flipping the  Preserve directory structure? setting,
which I hope you can test then merge/transplant to the trunk:

https://bitbucket.org/peterjc/galaxy-central/changeset/669dcc2803ba

I'm still working on the Copy data into Galaxy? setting...

Peter

___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Upload files from filesystem paths - backwards checkboxes

2011-03-11 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hello Peter,

Thanks for the patch - I've applied a corrected version of it in change set 
5215:74c4dd43485a.  Let  me know if you'd rather have me flip the Copy data 
into Galaxy? feature.  I'd be happy to, but I don't want to reinvent the wheel 
if you're close.

Thanks!

Greg Von Kuster


On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Peter Cock wrote:

 
 Patch for flipping the  Preserve directory structure? setting,
 which I hope you can test then merge/transplant to the trunk:
 
 https://bitbucket.org/peterjc/galaxy-central/changeset/669dcc2803ba
 
 I'm still working on the Copy data into Galaxy? setting...
 
 

Greg Von Kuster
Galaxy Development Team
g...@bx.psu.edu




___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Upload files from filesystem paths - backwards checkboxes

2011-03-11 Thread Peter Cock
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
 Hello Peter,

 Thanks for the patch - I've applied a corrected version of it in change
 set 5215:74c4dd43485a.  Let  me know if you'd rather have me flip
 the Copy data into Galaxy? feature.  I'd be happy to, but I don't
 want to reinvent the wheel if you're close.

 Thanks!

 Greg Von Kuster

Using util.string_as_bool looks good - I didn't know about that
and it looks far more rhobust.

Would you might doing Copy data into Galaxy? as well? I got
most of the way but got dragged off to a meeting in the middle.

Thanks!

Peter

___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Upload files from filesystem paths - backwards checkboxes

2011-03-11 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter,

This has been resolved in change set 5217:70d7d0bfaad6, where I've changed the 
check box into a select list per your suggestion.

Thanks!

Greg Von Kuster

On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Peter Cock wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Via the Galaxy admin interface, I'm currently importing some BAM
 files into a library from the local file system. Since they are big, I
 don't want Galaxy to copy them.
 
 So I looked at the Copy data into Galaxy? option and made
 sure it wasn't ticked. Galaxy did copy the file :(
 
 I looked at the interface again, and see you have:
 
 Copy data into Galaxy?
 [check box] No
 Normally data uploaded with this tool is copied into Galaxy's files
 directory so any later changes to the data will not affect Galaxy.
 However, this may not be desired (especially for large NGS
 datasets), so use of this option will force Galaxy to always
 read the data from its original path.
 
 You've got a tick box labelled No so it does the opposite to the
 question above it. That is a HORRIBLE interface. I can't be the
 first person to be tricked by it, can I?
 
 I would urge you to remove the work No and flip the meaning
 (and default) to match. But that could confuse existing admin
 users used to clicking from previous habit.
 
 How about making it a select parameter instead, with options
 Copy files (default) and Link to files which is very explicit?
 
 Likewise for the Preserve directory structure? setting, I'd
 remove the No caption and flip the setting, or just replace
 the backwards tick box with a select parameter offering
 Preserve directory structure and Place in selected folder
 (or something like that).
 
 Pretty please? How about if I write and test the patch?
 
 Peter
 ___
 Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
 in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
 and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
 
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Greg Von Kuster
Galaxy Development Team
g...@bx.psu.edu




___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Upload files from filesystem paths - backwards checkboxes

2011-03-10 Thread Glen Beane

On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Peter Cock wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Via the Galaxy admin interface, I'm currently importing some BAM
 files into a library from the local file system. Since they are big, I
 don't want Galaxy to copy them.
 
 So I looked at the Copy data into Galaxy? option and made
 sure it wasn't ticked. Galaxy did copy the file :(
 
 I looked at the interface again, and see you have:
 
 Copy data into Galaxy?
 [check box] No
 Normally data uploaded with this tool is copied into Galaxy's files
 directory so any later changes to the data will not affect Galaxy.
 However, this may not be desired (especially for large NGS
 datasets), so use of this option will force Galaxy to always
 read the data from its original path.
 
 You've got a tick box labelled No so it does the opposite to the
 question above it. That is a HORRIBLE interface. I can't be the
 first person to be tricked by it, can I?

I had a co-worker mess this up too.  I thought this was a poor design decision. 
 I thought maybe yes/no radio options would work.  Copy data into galaxy? 
yes(*) no( )



 I would urge you to remove the work No and flip the meaning
 (and default) to match. But that could confuse existing admin
 users used to clicking from previous habit.
 
 How about making it a select parameter instead, with options
 Copy files (default) and Link to files which is very explicit?

I think this would be better than the current no check box,  and more 
explicit than my yes(*) no () radio buttons


 Likewise for the Preserve directory structure? setting, I'd
 remove the No caption and flip the setting, or just replace
 the backwards tick box with a select parameter offering
 Preserve directory structure and Place in selected folder
 (or something like that).
 
 Pretty please? How about if I write and test the patch?
 
 Peter
 ___
 Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
 in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
 and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
 
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

--
Glen L. Beane
Senior Software Engineer
The Jackson Laboratory
(207) 288-6153





___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/