Re: [galaxy-dev] PR 149

2015-04-29 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Roberto Alonso CIPF wrote: > Ok, no problems ;) > It is another PR, I think it is useful without the other PR, for example > when you map with BWA. The last PR will be like the next step, I mean for > example that you split a bam to do some calling or whatever. I

Re: [galaxy-dev] PR 149

2015-04-29 Thread Roberto Alonso CIPF
Ok, no problems ;) It is another PR, I think it is useful without the other PR, for example when you map with BWA. The last PR will be like the next step, I mean for example that you split a bam to do some calling or whatever. I think both PR can live independently and together... I don't know if

Re: [galaxy-dev] PR 149

2015-04-29 Thread John Chilton
No it just slipped through the cracks - sorry about that. I have commented on it now. There was a time when a couple weeks before a first response was the norm :). Does it belong with the bam splitting pull request - is merging useful on its own without the other piece you are working on. -John

[galaxy-dev] PR 149

2015-04-29 Thread Roberto Alonso CIPF
Hello, I created a PR https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/pull/149 dome days ago, but I don't have any feedback yet, is there any problem with it? Is it not interesting for the current Galaxy? didn't the authors realized about it? It would be nice to have some feedback, even if it is not a co