All -
Certainly this is a very real and important problem.
The devteam hasn't moved on the tagging approach outlined in the dev
thread referenced by Peter and I suspect that is because I the
prevailing thought on the team is that dataset naming is not the most
appropriate abstraction to use to ad
Yes :(
There's been some past discussion of this from a tool developer
perspective, e.g. https://trello.com/c/JnhOEqow and
http://dev.list.galaxyproject.org/Using-input-dataset-names-in-output-dataset-names-td4662481.html
The best individual tool authors can do is something like
"$input.name proc
