Re: [galaxy-user] Most Popular Linux flavour for Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Louise-Amélie Schmitt
Hi, Our local instance runs on CentOS 5 and is happy with it :) We didn't have the choice though. Regards L-A Le 07/06/2011 14:00, Matloob Khushi a écrit : Hello Galaxy Users We are anticipating setting up a local instance of Galaxy and wondering what is the most popular (or best) flavour

Re: [galaxy-user] Loading files to local Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Paul-Michael Agapow
From: Tilahun Abebe tilahun.ab...@uni.edu We are trying to load Illumina data to our local Galaxy instance. The files are between 700 MB and 2.2 GB. Files below 2 GB load in less than 5 minutes. Files larger than 2 GB don't upload at all. We installed Galaxy locally because we thought

Re: [galaxy-user] Most Popular Linux flavour for Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Nate Coraor
Matloob Khushi wrote: Hello Galaxy Users We are anticipating setting up a local instance of Galaxy and wondering what is the most popular (or best) flavour of Linux people out there using. I wonder which OS on UseGalaxy.org has been used. Thanks for your help. Hi Matloob, The public

Re: [galaxy-user] Loading files to local Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Nate Coraor
Paul-Michael Agapow wrote: From: Tilahun Abebe tilahun.ab...@uni.edu We are trying to load Illumina data to our local Galaxy instance. The files are between 700 MB and 2.2 GB. Files below 2 GB load in less than 5 minutes. Files larger than 2 GB don't upload at all. We installed

Re: [galaxy-user] Loading files to local Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Tilahun Abebe
Thank you Paul and Nate. We will try the options you suggested. One thing we found to work much faster (less than 5 minutes for most files) is to upload zipped data. Galaxy could upload and unzip the files without any problem. It doesn't seem any sequence data is lost. Has anyone tried this

Re: [galaxy-user] Loading files to local Galaxy

2011-06-07 Thread Nate Coraor
Tilahun Abebe wrote: Thank you Paul and Nate. We will try the options you suggested. One thing we found to work much faster (less than 5 minutes for most files) is to upload zipped data. Galaxy could upload and unzip the files without any problem. It doesn't seem any sequence data is lost.

Re: [galaxy-user] UCSC-EMBOSS/fuzznuc-UCSC workflow?

2011-06-07 Thread Robert Curtis Hendrickson
Jen, Thanks for all your help. Here's the final Galaxy workflow for doing FUZZNUC on a BED file from UCSC Table Browser, then producing BED file that you can view in UCSC. http://main.g2.bx.psu.edu/u/curtish-uab/w/fuzznucucscbed I do not include the Get Flank operation in this base