Agreed we're getting off topic a bit- but it seems I've caused a bit of
confusion, and I'd like to try to clear it up if possible.
I'm fully aware of how useful and popular linux/unix is, especially in server
environments, and use terminals on a regular basis.
My example of commands was poorly
I do agree.
And for me its the other way.
Windows is to simple, so if it breaks no one knows what to do anymore.
On 11/03/2017 4:33 a.m., Travis Siegel wrote:
This is just plain wrong. Dos was not overly complicated, unix still
exists, and it is very similar to dos. The only thing dos
This is just plain wrong. Dos was not overly complicated, unix still
exists, and it is very similar to dos. The only thing dos didn't do was
multitask (though later versions of dos and 3rd party utilities did solve
this problem to some degree), the fact that you didn't understand it
doesn't
