Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Thomas Ward
Hi Michael,

While I take your point just keep in mind here Microsoft's aim of
Windows 7 was to make the operating system more stable, streamline the
install, and basically remove a bunch of extra apps and components
they felt were unecessary. That's why a lot of older apps were removed
from the install.

For example, take e-mail. When Windows XP was released in 2001 most
people used a dedicated e-mail client like Outlook Express to check
their e-mail. However, in 2011 the majority of internet service
providers offers webmail accounts, and there are a lot of people who
now use Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo Mail, etc and use the web interface to
check mail. Therefore the need for a dedicated e-mail client has
dramatically dropped and that's why something like Outlook Express and
Windows Mail don't ship with Windows 7 by default. The times have
changed where Outlook Express and Windows Mail aren't strictly
necessary applications for a lot of Windows users.

That said, there really isn't a good answer for installing the old
Windows Pinball game, Windows Movie Maker, or the Windows XP volume
control. The best answer I can give for a situation like that is if
you have a copy of Windows XP to make a backup of the programs and
icons you want to say and manually install them on Windows 7 by hand.
there really isn't any other way I know of to get some of those apps
and games Microsoft has dropped support for then to back them up
yourself.

Cheers!


On 12/12/11, Michael Gauler michael.gau...@gmx.de wrote:
 Hi Thomas,
 Yes, windows programs get new features and yes, it is up to you to decide if
 you want to use them or not...
 But let me ask you something just as an example.
 Do you know what the difference between Windows Movie Maker and Windows Live
 Movie Maker is?
 As far as I am informed the Windows Movie Maker of XP or Vista isn't
 included in Windows 7 anymore and the Windows Live product of the same name
 is not the same product with more features and just a new design.
 A blind person might not be interested in video editing, but a sighted
 person could be.
 Or another example is E-Mail programs.
 Windows XP had Outlook Express, Vista had Windows Mail and Windows 7 has the
 Windows Mail folder included, but the program cannot be run except you can
 replace the entire Windows Mail folder in your program files directory with
 the folder from a Vista installation...
 Or you use Windows Live products again...
 But the question remains what about things dropped out of an operating
 system?
 You are right in saying that Windows Explorer of Windows 7 has more features
 than the one of Windows 98 - no doubt there.
 But what about dropped features?
 While the system restore feature of Windows XP is good, it is not needed
 when you just want to repair your registry a bit for which Windows 98 had
 scanreg.
 Now you are required to buy third party tools like Tune Up Utilities or
 other PC cleaning and tuning programs to get similar features.
 Or what about the Windows XP style volume control program or the XP style
 Audio Recorder?
 What do I do with Windows 7 and altered or missing programs (not limited to
 programs best accessible for blind people)?
 Or does Windows 7 still include the Pinball game from Windows ME or later
 from XP?
 You get what I mean.


 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread shaun everiss

Hi trouble.
Hmmm this is quite lively.
In responce to the touch issue, as long as we can get a keyboard of 
sorts on a system I am all for touch, maybe have speech rec to.
Ofcause the fact with apple that you have different chalenges is 
something to think about though I have heard users touch and go quite 
fast, faster than the board.

Windows being touch, hmmm.
Jaws etc will cost lots to upgrade, nvda is the only one that is 
thinking about developing touch as far as I know.

Ofcause we would have to make another touch system.
We must remember that all the interfaces, reader, etc are kernal 
based, no doubt we will have other issues with touch.
However that would solve a lot of the issues we are and could have in 
the future.

it would make us freer.
However I have people that still think the mouse and touch systems 
are not a good idea.

I have gotten used to swamp with the mouse and am about to upgrade.
Touch, hmmm maybe if I got a bigger pad, hmmm.
At 07:46 a.m. 12/12/2011 -0500, you wrote:
The next move for screen readers should be touch. Apple already 
makes use of this and I use it a lot. i go through twice as much 
email as i can with jaws and lets not forget moving around on the 
computer with just my finger and no spoken commands. The games that 
can be explored by touch are going to be interesting. Just look what 
the mouse has done. And that could of ben done sooner. The problem 
is those that write the screen readers didn't think blind people 
could use a mouse.


At 02:18 AM 12/12/2011, you wrote:

Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:
 Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
 programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
 do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
 processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why 
can't they
 just leave well enough alone once they get a system that 
actually does what

 it's supposed to do?

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread shaun everiss
we never had to pay for service packs but oses 7 and vista, yeah we 
had to pay for both.

At 09:26 a.m. 12/12/2011 -0600, you wrote:
Sort of like paying for a whole bunch of benefits that are provided 
by a hotel that you won't be using, in case you did want to use 
them.  That part I understand.  But building a new one every 2 years 
or so and, after a time, closing the older one that is more popular 
and that no longer has plumbing or electrical problems, so that the 
customer must use the one that still has the bugs in it?  That's 
what I don't like.  If I have something that is stable and basically 
reliably bug free, why should I have to get the new one that is 
not?  If they want to make more money, their product should be worth 
the cost we must pay.  Service packs for XP were free of charge, and 
they fixed what we had to pay for, that was broke, to begin 
with.  Windows 7 fixed the Vista bugs, and I think we had to pay for 
both?  I might be wrong in that one, though.


---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - From: Thomas Ward thomasward1...@gmail.com
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an 
updated Lone Wolf




Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:

Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
it's supposed to do?

---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread shaun everiss
sound, we need drivers with everything, though now ms have generic 
drivers you think they would have loaded those for the installs now.

At 05:01 p.m. 12/12/2011 +0100, you wrote:

Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features 
in future Windows operating systems or other programs.

But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often 
good for all users and not because security might be better.
But what I often don't get is why people think it is time to force 
design changes.

I know of the ribbon interface of MS Office products and such.
I don't have used them (Office 2007 or 2010) thus I won't comment on 
which screen reader can best handle it.

I also know that every major upgrade brings new features as well.
But what I don't get is why MS did come up with the new interface 
and removed the old interface instead of having them both in the 
product for every person sighted or not to choose the design of their product.
I mean, why do programs like Winamp or Windows Media Player allow 
skins or skin packs?
The players ship with a standard interface, but are open for user 
created content.
Besides I had a sighted teacher who personally told me that he had 
several sighted friends and colleagues who were users of MS Office 
pre 2007 and when the new products came out they also had problems 
adapting and getting to figure out the new interface and they could 
see and use the mouse properly compared to us blind people.

And about screen readers like Voice Over or Narrator.
It would be good if thoose could be improoved.
But what I still don't get is why any assistive technology included 
in an operating system (windows mostly) cannot be used to aid during 
first installation (when you format your hard drive or when you use 
a blank one).
For years there was nothing short of a sighted person to help even 
if it became a bit easier with unattended installations of XP and a 
few older Windows versions.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.




---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Trouble
How do you expect to use the hardware, and incase you didn't know. 
All versions of ops need drivers to run the hardware.


At 04:25 AM 12/13/2011, you wrote:
sound, we need drivers with everything, though now ms have generic 
drivers you think they would have loaded those for the installs now.

At 05:01 p.m. 12/12/2011 +0100, you wrote:

Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features 
in future Windows operating systems or other programs.

But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often 
good for all users and not because security might be better.
But what I often don't get is why people think it is time to force 
design changes.

I know of the ribbon interface of MS Office products and such.
I don't have used them (Office 2007 or 2010) thus I won't comment 
on which screen reader can best handle it.

I also know that every major upgrade brings new features as well.
But what I don't get is why MS did come up with the new interface 
and removed the old interface instead of having them both in the 
product for every person sighted or not to choose the design of their product.
I mean, why do programs like Winamp or Windows Media Player allow 
skins or skin packs?
The players ship with a standard interface, but are open for user 
created content.
Besides I had a sighted teacher who personally told me that he had 
several sighted friends and colleagues who were users of MS Office 
pre 2007 and when the new products came out they also had problems 
adapting and getting to figure out the new interface and they could 
see and use the mouse properly compared to us blind people.

And about screen readers like Voice Over or Narrator.
It would be good if thoose could be improoved.
But what I still don't get is why any assistive technology included 
in an operating system (windows mostly) cannot be used to aid 
during first installation (when you format your hard drive or when 
you use a blank one).
For years there was nothing short of a sighted person to help even 
if it became a bit easier with unattended installations of XP and a 
few older Windows versions.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.




---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Trouble
And just what plan it you from? Because I run both of those ops and 
never paid for sp1 on any op.


At 04:18 AM 12/13/2011, you wrote:
we never had to pay for service packs but oses 7 and vista, yeah we 
had to pay for both.

At 09:26 a.m. 12/12/2011 -0600, you wrote:
Sort of like paying for a whole bunch of benefits that are provided 
by a hotel that you won't be using, in case you did want to use 
them.  That part I understand.  But building a new one every 2 
years or so and, after a time, closing the older one that is more 
popular and that no longer has plumbing or electrical problems, so 
that the customer must use the one that still has the bugs in 
it?  That's what I don't like.  If I have something that is stable 
and basically reliably bug free, why should I have to get the new 
one that is not?  If they want to make more money, their product 
should be worth the cost we must pay.  Service packs for XP were 
free of charge, and they fixed what we had to pay for, that was 
broke, to begin with.  Windows 7 fixed the Vista bugs, and I think 
we had to pay for both?  I might be wrong in that one, though.


---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - From: Thomas Ward thomasward1...@gmail.com
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an 
updated Lone Wolf




Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:

Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
it's supposed to do?

---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Michael Gauler

Hi Thomas,
I am aware of this, but I am seriously questioning some of theese facts.
Why do I have to use my web browser for dealing with E-Mails, when I have 
any Mail application installed, whether it is from MS or someone else.
I know a friend and one of her mail accounts was with the German part of 
Windows Live.
She personally told me that the web interface to access and send mails via 
her live account was inaccessible.

Thus using Thunderbird for example was a good choice for her.
But this doesn't explain why they want to promote the Windows Live tools.
As I said, the feature set of Windows Live Mail is not the same as Windows 
Mail from Windows Vista...
And Movie Maker of XP might be old, but there is also a version of Movie 
Maker in Vista...
But Windows Live Movie Maker you are encouraged to use is not mainly a video 
recording and editing tool, but more like a content preparation tool for 
video sharing on platforms like Youtube.
It means pa program with a similar name, but an entire new program behind 
the name.
While I personally have no problems with a video sharing tool, I have a 
problem when MS says we dropped a video editing tool from Windows 7, but 
hey, there is a program with the same name, but totally different 
functionality!...

Same goes for Windows volume control.
I had the misfortune to atempt to assist my sighted mother with playback of 
some non standard Midi files on a Windows 7 laptop, where the installation 
medium (DVD) is altered by the manufacturer in a bad way...
The result of the atempted midi playback left much to be desired and because 
the volume control program of XP was missing  plus some more sound related 
settings, I quickly came to the end of my knowledge even with a totally 
sighted person next to me...
That's the thing I meant... 



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Willem Venter
Shaun, you said:
We must remember that all the interfaces, reader, etc are kernal
based, no doubt we will have other issues with touch.

What exactly do you mean by this statement? If I decode this
correctly, do you imply that all screen readers need to install hooks
into the windows kernel that might not work the same on each system?
This is not true by the way. NVDA and System access does not require
any hooks into the kernel of windows and as long as you use the
methods to access the touch pad or anything else, I can't see what the
problem might be. The method jfw, etc uses will need to be changed
anyway as windows 8 is very different in this regard to windows 7 and
these hooks into the kernel won't work as before.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread Hayden Presley
HI,
Wait...wait...go back. You are suggesting Microsoft make available the
ribbon interface and menubarsat the same time? All right: that's all well
and good. But what if they develop a third interface. Thenyou just tack that
onto the list of interfaces, right? Then a fourth? And a fifth? We keep
complaining that Windows is getting more and more bloated, but what about
this kind of thing?
Best Regards,
Hayden


-Original Message-
From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Gauler
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf

Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future

Windows operating systems or other programs.
But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often good for 
all users and not because security might be better.
But what I often don't get is why people think it is time to force design 
changes.
I know of the ribbon interface of MS Office products and such.
I don't have used them (Office 2007 or 2010) thus I won't comment on which 
screen reader can best handle it.
I also know that every major upgrade brings new features as well.
But what I don't get is why MS did come up with the new interface and 
removed the old interface instead of having them both in the product for 
every person sighted or not to choose the design of their product.
I mean, why do programs like Winamp or Windows Media Player allow skins or 
skin packs?
The players ship with a standard interface, but are open for user created 
content.
Besides I had a sighted teacher who personally told me that he had several 
sighted friends and colleagues who were users of MS Office pre 2007 and when

the new products came out they also had problems adapting and getting to 
figure out the new interface and they could see and use the mouse properly 
compared to us blind people.
And about screen readers like Voice Over or Narrator.
It would be good if thoose could be improoved.
But what I still don't get is why any assistive technology included in an 
operating system (windows mostly) cannot be used to aid during first 
installation (when you format your hard drive or when you use a blank one).
For years there was nothing short of a sighted person to help even if it 
became a bit easier with unattended installations of XP and a few older 
Windows versions. 


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-13 Thread shaun everiss

we almost need skinable oses, office, etc like winamp.
Then we can install what we want.
So windows should start with a bare bones interface then once we have 
sound, etc we can actually load the interface ourselves.
I myself would like an event with ambient sound that plays one sound 
constantly, and have each key on the keyboard make a sound, enter 
make a sound, menus, etc as well as the other things when you open 
programs, etc, maybe have programs make their own sound.
Then I could run my system like a trek ship or something, I am not 
sure how distracting it could be though but still.

At 07:03 p.m. 13/12/2011 -0600, you wrote:

HI,
Wait...wait...go back. You are suggesting Microsoft make available the
ribbon interface and menubarsat the same time? All right: that's all well
and good. But what if they develop a third interface. Thenyou just tack that
onto the list of interfaces, right? Then a fourth? And a fifth? We keep
complaining that Windows is getting more and more bloated, but what about
this kind of thing?
Best Regards,
Hayden


-Original Message-
From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Gauler
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf

Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future

Windows operating systems or other programs.
But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often good for
all users and not because security might be better.
But what I often don't get is why people think it is time to force design
changes.
I know of the ribbon interface of MS Office products and such.
I don't have used them (Office 2007 or 2010) thus I won't comment on which
screen reader can best handle it.
I also know that every major upgrade brings new features as well.
But what I don't get is why MS did come up with the new interface and
removed the old interface instead of having them both in the product for
every person sighted or not to choose the design of their product.
I mean, why do programs like Winamp or Windows Media Player allow skins or
skin packs?
The players ship with a standard interface, but are open for user created
content.
Besides I had a sighted teacher who personally told me that he had several
sighted friends and colleagues who were users of MS Office pre 2007 and when

the new products came out they also had problems adapting and getting to
figure out the new interface and they could see and use the mouse properly
compared to us blind people.
And about screen readers like Voice Over or Narrator.
It would be good if thoose could be improoved.
But what I still don't get is why any assistive technology included in an
operating system (windows mostly) cannot be used to aid during first
installation (when you format your hard drive or when you use a blank one).
For years there was nothing short of a sighted person to help even if it
became a bit easier with unattended installations of XP and a few older
Windows versions.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.




---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas Ward
 that we've gone as far as we need to.  The fact
 that you, or I may not have a use case for updating a particular item now
 doesn't mean that at some point a new set of possibilities may not occur
 that would make such a use case compelling.

 Sorry for this near rant, but I see this kind of thinking in all sorts of
 arenas and not just among disabled folk.  I think it's important that we
 embrace advances in technology when it is prudent to do so and not be afraid
 of change.

   Chris Bartlett


 -Original Message-
 From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
 Behalf Of Charles Rivard
 Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
 To: Gamers Discussion list
 Subject: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone
 Wolf

 Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
 programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
 do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
 processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
 just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
 it's supposed to do?

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

 - Original Message -
 From: dark d...@xgam.org
 To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
 Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf


 Hi Alex.

 As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they have to,
 even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.

 it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older
 programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better it
 seems without actually considdering what people want their computers for,
 namely to run programs.

 comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with compltely new
 hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.

 Even the big console developers are realizing that people like running
 their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual arcade and other
 such software versions of older games stil available on modern machines.

 Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their
 products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.

 for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other applications
 would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.

 I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and doing their

 own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply because they are a big

 fat company who just care about the prophit.

 Beware the grue!

 Dark.

 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the
 list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Trouble
The next move for screen readers should be touch. Apple already makes 
use of this and I use it a lot. i go through twice as much email as i 
can with jaws and lets not forget moving around on the computer with 
just my finger and no spoken commands. The games that can be explored 
by touch are going to be interesting. Just look what the mouse has 
done. And that could of ben done sooner. The problem is those that 
write the screen readers didn't think blind people could use a mouse.


At 02:18 AM 12/12/2011, you wrote:

Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:
 Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
 programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
 do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
 processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
 just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
 it's supposed to do?

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Charles Rivard
Sort of like paying for a whole bunch of benefits that are provided by a 
hotel that you won't be using, in case you did want to use them.  That part 
I understand.  But building a new one every 2 years or so and, after a time, 
closing the older one that is more popular and that no longer has plumbing 
or electrical problems, so that the customer must use the one that still has 
the bugs in it?  That's what I don't like.  If I have something that is 
stable and basically reliably bug free, why should I have to get the new one 
that is not?  If they want to make more money, their product should be worth 
the cost we must pay.  Service packs for XP were free of charge, and they 
fixed what we had to pay for, that was broke, to begin with.  Windows 7 
fixed the Vista bugs, and I think we had to pay for both?  I might be wrong 
in that one, though.


---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Ward thomasward1...@gmail.com

To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated 
Lone Wolf




Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:

Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers 
to
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more 
powerful
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't 
they
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does 
what

it's supposed to do?

---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the 
list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org. 



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Gauler

Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future 
Windows operating systems or other programs.

But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often good for 
all users and not because security might be better.
But what I often don't get is why people think it is time to force design 
changes.

I know of the ribbon interface of MS Office products and such.
I don't have used them (Office 2007 or 2010) thus I won't comment on which 
screen reader can best handle it.

I also know that every major upgrade brings new features as well.
But what I don't get is why MS did come up with the new interface and 
removed the old interface instead of having them both in the product for 
every person sighted or not to choose the design of their product.
I mean, why do programs like Winamp or Windows Media Player allow skins or 
skin packs?
The players ship with a standard interface, but are open for user created 
content.
Besides I had a sighted teacher who personally told me that he had several 
sighted friends and colleagues who were users of MS Office pre 2007 and when 
the new products came out they also had problems adapting and getting to 
figure out the new interface and they could see and use the mouse properly 
compared to us blind people.

And about screen readers like Voice Over or Narrator.
It would be good if thoose could be improoved.
But what I still don't get is why any assistive technology included in an 
operating system (windows mostly) cannot be used to aid during first 
installation (when you format your hard drive or when you use a blank one).
For years there was nothing short of a sighted person to help even if it 
became a bit easier with unattended installations of XP and a few older 
Windows versions. 



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Gauler

Hi Thomas,
Yes, windows programs get new features and yes, it is up to you to decide if 
you want to use them or not...

But let me ask you something just as an example.
Do you know what the difference between Windows Movie Maker and Windows Live 
Movie Maker is?
As far as I am informed the Windows Movie Maker of XP or Vista isn't 
included in Windows 7 anymore and the Windows Live product of the same name 
is not the same product with more features and just a new design.
A blind person might not be interested in video editing, but a sighted 
person could be.

Or another example is E-Mail programs.
Windows XP had Outlook Express, Vista had Windows Mail and Windows 7 has the 
Windows Mail folder included, but the program cannot be run except you can 
replace the entire Windows Mail folder in your program files directory with 
the folder from a Vista installation...

Or you use Windows Live products again...
But the question remains what about things dropped out of an operating 
system?
You are right in saying that Windows Explorer of Windows 7 has more features 
than the one of Windows 98 - no doubt there.

But what about dropped features?
While the system restore feature of Windows XP is good, it is not needed 
when you just want to repair your registry a bit for which Windows 98 had 
scanreg.
Now you are required to buy third party tools like Tune Up Utilities or 
other PC cleaning and tuning programs to get similar features.
Or what about the Windows XP style volume control program or the XP style 
Audio Recorder?
What do I do with Windows 7 and altered or missing programs (not limited to 
programs best accessible for blind people)?
Or does Windows 7 still include the Pinball game from Windows ME or later 
from XP?
You get what I mean. 



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-12 Thread Alex Kenny
Hi Charles,

The problem is that trying to maintain old software uses up a lot of
resources and becomes very expensive. It is almost impossible to
create bug-free software without expending huge amounts of software.
NASA, for example, spends billions of dollars and countless months of
testing to ensure that their software is bug-free. That's just not
feesible with a piece of software as complex as an operating system.
You might think Windows XP is stable and bug-free, but I can guarantee
you that it's not and never will be. Every month, Microsoft releases
several patches to fix problems, and when XP leaves support in 2014,
13 years after it was released, there will still be countless bugs
that haven't been discovered.

You could ask the question, why can't MS just keep supporting XP?
Because by then, they'll be trying to support Windows Server 2003,
Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows 8, Windows 8
Server, and the next version of Windows will be in development. They
can't just keep supporting old operating systems forever, because
eventually they'll be expending all their resources trying to support
old code and trying to build new technologies on top of it. There's a
reason Windows 9X was abandoned in favor of NT-based operating systems
such as XP, and that's because those systems were no longer meeting
peooples' needs and couldn't keep up with new technology.


On 12/12/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:
 Sort of like paying for a whole bunch of benefits that are provided by a
 hotel that you won't be using, in case you did want to use them.  That part
 I understand.  But building a new one every 2 years or so and, after a time,
 closing the older one that is more popular and that no longer has plumbing
 or electrical problems, so that the customer must use the one that still has
 the bugs in it?  That's what I don't like.  If I have something that is
 stable and basically reliably bug free, why should I have to get the new one
 that is not?  If they want to make more money, their product should be worth
 the cost we must pay.  Service packs for XP were free of charge, and they
 fixed what we had to pay for, that was broke, to begin with.  Windows 7
 fixed the Vista bugs, and I think we had to pay for both?  I might be wrong
 in that one, though.

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

 - Original Message -
 From: Thomas Ward thomasward1...@gmail.com
 To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
 Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
 Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
 Lone Wolf


 Hi ?Charles,

 Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
 them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

 It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
 broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
 do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
 etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
 that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
 Explorer as a simple example here.

 Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
 Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
 cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
 cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
 files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
 clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
 version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
 different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
 similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
 beside the point.

 The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
 different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
 more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
 recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
 it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
 advantage of the features and updates that are there.

 For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
 applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
 time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
 and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
 useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
 of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
 little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
 Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

 My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
 release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
 the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really

[Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Charles Rivard
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and 
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to 
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful 
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they 
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what 
it's supposed to do?


---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - 
From: dark d...@xgam.org

To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf



Hi Alex.

As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they have to, 
even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.


it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older 
programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better it 
seems without actually considdering what people want their computers for, 
namely to run programs.


comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with compltely new 
hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.


Even the big console developers are realizing that people like running 
their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual arcade and other 
such software versions of older games stil available on modern machines.


Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their 
products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.


for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other applications 
would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.


I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and doing their 
own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply because they are a big 
fat company who just care about the prophit.


Beware the grue!

Dark.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the 
list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org. 



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Alex Kenny
While money is one motivating factor, one reason you can't just stop
once you get a system that works is that, with something as complex as
an operating system and the fallibility of programmers, it's almost
impossible to get a system that does exactly what you want. Any
operating system meant for modern desktop users has millions of lines
of code, and there's bound to be quite a few mistakes.

Another reason is that hardware and technology evolve. New hardware is
created, better security solutions are created, and better ways of
doing things in general. If MS had decided, after releasing Windows 98
that it was perfect and they were done, Windows would have died to be
replaced by OS x or Linux, which support WiFi, Bluetooth and USB,
which are just a few technologies that have developed since then.

As for system resources, it is true that the jump between Windows XP
and Vista was a hard one, because Vista requires much more CPU
resources and  emory. It's important to note though that Windows 7's
requirements are identical to Vista, and Windows 8 will actually have
lower requirements.

I'm curious about the aversion to new technology that seems to be
common in the blindness community. It's true that many in this
community are on fixed incomes and can't always afford to upgrade,
there seems to be an aversion to having to learn any new software
interfaces, even when those new interfaces are perfectly accessible
and come with an upgrade that they've purchased. This seems to occur
even within assistive technology companies, which I suspect have a
large responsibility for this. Older versions of JAWS used to
recommend disabling Windows XP's features, and I remember listening to
a Serotek podcast in which the developers of System Access were
fawning over a product that disabled features in Windows 7. This is a
bit puzzling to me, as all of those features were perfectly
accessible.

On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:
 Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
 programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
 do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
 processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
 just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
 it's supposed to do?

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

 - Original Message -
 From: dark d...@xgam.org
 To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
 Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf


 Hi Alex.

 As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they have to,
 even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.

 it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older
 programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better it
 seems without actually considdering what people want their computers for,
 namely to run programs.

 comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with compltely new
 hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.

 Even the big console developers are realizing that people like running
 their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual arcade and other
 such software versions of older games stil available on modern machines.

 Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their
 products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.

 for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other applications
 would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.

 I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and doing their

 own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply because they are a big

 fat company who just care about the prophit.

 Beware the grue!

 Dark.

 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the
 list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Christopher Bartlett
When is it the right time to stop innovating?  When can you be certain that
more processing power will never be necessary?  When will you have found
everything that everyone needs to do, and when will they be able to do it
well enough?

The thing about technological advances is that each one not only makes
things possible that weren't, but makes things possible that no one could
imagine before the advance took place.  

Sure, computers work well enough, if you discount all the myriad times when
they don't.  I can do everything I need to do currently (except music
editing/production) on my two-year-old netbook running Windows XP.  I
haven't upgraded to Windows 7 because I haven't had a compelling use case to
do so.  But it would I think be presumptuous of me to say that the evolution
of computers and operating systems has gone far enough and can't we please
just be happy with what we have?

Look at the cell phone world.  Even two years ago, the idea of full
accessibility to a cell phone was still a fractured dream for blind users.
IOS began changing that thought, but now there's competition and different
ways of doing things, and the dream of a voice-powered, pseudo-intelligent
personal assistant is at least on the horizon, with early prototypes out in
the world.  The revolutions in access these technologies promise weren't
imaginable for most people when we had dumb phones that simply made calls
and maybe kept a calendar and task list.  We are within a few years of the
mass obsolescence of a lot of specialized access technology, with the
accompanying blindness tax that will make access to many things available
to people who can't afford to drop a thousand dollars on  a piece of
specialized software, or $7,000 for a notetaker.

So be not over hasty to say that we've gone as far as we need to.  The fact
that you, or I may not have a use case for updating a particular item now
doesn't mean that at some point a new set of possibilities may not occur
that would make such a use case compelling.

Sorry for this near rant, but I see this kind of thinking in all sorts of
arenas and not just among disabled folk.  I think it's important that we
embrace advances in technology when it is prudent to do so and not be afraid
of change.

Chris Bartlett


-Original Message-
From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Rivard
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone
Wolf

Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and 
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to 
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful 
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they 
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what 
it's supposed to do?

---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - 
From: dark d...@xgam.org
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf


 Hi Alex.

 As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they have to, 
 even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.

 it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older 
 programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better it 
 seems without actually considdering what people want their computers for, 
 namely to run programs.

 comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with compltely new 
 hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.

 Even the big console developers are realizing that people like running 
 their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual arcade and other 
 such software versions of older games stil available on modern machines.

 Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their 
 products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.

 for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other applications 
 would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.

 I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and doing their

 own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply because they are a big

 fat company who just care about the prophit.

 Beware the grue!

 Dark.

 ---
 Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
 If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
 gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
 You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
 http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
 All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
 If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the 
 list,
 please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org. 


---
Gamers

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Dallas O'Brien
hi chris. well put. and i for one, love to see what games we will be 
able to make with the newer operating systems and hardware in time to 
come! its going to be a blast!

dallas


On 12/12/2011 10:20, Christopher Bartlett wrote:

When is it the right time to stop innovating?  When can you be certain that
more processing power will never be necessary?  When will you have found
everything that everyone needs to do, and when will they be able to do it
well enough?

The thing about technological advances is that each one not only makes
things possible that weren't, but makes things possible that no one could
imagine before the advance took place.

Sure, computers work well enough, if you discount all the myriad times when
they don't.  I can do everything I need to do currently (except music
editing/production) on my two-year-old netbook running Windows XP.  I
haven't upgraded to Windows 7 because I haven't had a compelling use case to
do so.  But it would I think be presumptuous of me to say that the evolution
of computers and operating systems has gone far enough and can't we please
just be happy with what we have?

Look at the cell phone world.  Even two years ago, the idea of full
accessibility to a cell phone was still a fractured dream for blind users.
IOS began changing that thought, but now there's competition and different
ways of doing things, and the dream of a voice-powered, pseudo-intelligent
personal assistant is at least on the horizon, with early prototypes out in
the world.  The revolutions in access these technologies promise weren't
imaginable for most people when we had dumb phones that simply made calls
and maybe kept a calendar and task list.  We are within a few years of the
mass obsolescence of a lot of specialized access technology, with the
accompanying blindness tax that will make access to many things available
to people who can't afford to drop a thousand dollars on  a piece of
specialized software, or $7,000 for a notetaker.

So be not over hasty to say that we've gone as far as we need to.  The fact
that you, or I may not have a use case for updating a particular item now
doesn't mean that at some point a new set of possibilities may not occur
that would make such a use case compelling.

Sorry for this near rant, but I see this kind of thinking in all sorts of
arenas and not just among disabled folk.  I think it's important that we
embrace advances in technology when it is prudent to do so and not be afraid
of change.

Chris Bartlett


-Original Message-
From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Rivard
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone
Wolf

Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
it's supposed to do?

---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message -
From: darkd...@xgam.org
To: Gamers Discussion listgamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf



Hi Alex.

As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they have to,
even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.

it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older
programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better it
seems without actually considdering what people want their computers for,
namely to run programs.

comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with compltely new
hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.

Even the big console developers are realizing that people like running
their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual arcade and other
such software versions of older games stil available on modern machines.

Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their
products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.

for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other applications
would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.

I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and doing their
own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply because they are a big
fat company who just care about the prophit.

Beware the grue!

Dark.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail

Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread shaun everiss

You can blame the game nuts for that.
The sighted like using powerfull games which need that power.
As for upgrades all stuff needs to be upgraded, storage hardware, security etc.
At 04:32 p.m. 11/12/2011 -0600, you wrote:
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and 
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful 
computers to do the same tasks we were previously doing but having 
to use more powerful processors and use more of the resources to do 
those tasks?  Why can't they just leave well enough alone once they 
get a system that actually does what it's supposed to do?


---
Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

- Original Message - From: dark d...@xgam.org
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] plans for an updated Lone Wolf



Hi Alex.

As I said I'm not annoyed that  Microsoft update their os, they 
have to, even if we don't like some of their decisions on interfaces etc.


it just seems though that they don't give a dam about running older 
programs, games or anything else, they just claime newer = better 
it seems without actually considdering what people want their 
computers for, namely to run programs.


comador didn't do this with their os or machines, even with 
compltely new hardware, going from amigar 500 to 1200.


Even the big console developers are realizing that people like 
running their old games, hence the wii virtual consoles, virtual 
arcade and other such software versions of older games stil 
available on modern machines.


Microsoft though just seem to expect everyone to update, buy their 
products and cope, because newer is always better in their opinion.


for myself, if i could be certain all my games and other 
applications would work under windows 7, I'd be much less wary about updating.


I just see this as a case of not listening to the customer and 
doing their own dam thing and expecting everyone to cope simply 
because they are a big fat company who just care about the prophit.


Beware the grue!

Dark.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to 
gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.

You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.



---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.




---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Christopher Bartlett
There might be some truth in that, and as a community that wants ever more
complex  games ourselves, I can't blame anybody in that interchange.  Better
processing power = more potential for more immersive audio environments.

Chris Bartlett


-Original Message-
From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of shaun everiss
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:21 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf

You can blame the game nuts for that.
The sighted like using powerfull games which need that power.
As for upgrades all stuff needs to be upgraded, storage hardware, security
etc.


---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.


Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone Wolf

2011-12-11 Thread Thomas Ward
Hi ?Charles,

Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?

It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of if it ain't
broke don't fix it. While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same old things with OS that takes more memory, more CPU power,
etc but I don't think you are paying attention to features or upgrades
that have been added to the operating system. Let's use Windows
Explorer as a simple example here.

Back in Windows 98 you could not burn cds or dvds through Windows
Explorer. Beginning with Windows XP you could burn data cds and music
cds directly from Windows Explorer. In Windows 7 you can burn data
cds, music cds, data dvds, and make video  dvds by burning avi and mpg
files  to dvd all through Windows Explorer. My point being that we can
clearly see new features like this being added to each successive
version of Windows Explorer. Its really not a case of the same thing
different version as a lot of other Windows programs have undergone a
similar evolution. Weather you use those new features or not is really
beside the point.

The way I read your message is Microsoft doesn't do anything new or
different from one version of Windows to the next accept make the OS
more bloated, more of a memory hog, and there is nothing to ever
recommend upgrading. I suppose some of what you say has some truth to
it, but as I said above I think its simply a case of not taking
advantage of the features and updates that are there.

For instance,in Windows 7 there are a number of gadgets, little
applets, you can dock to your desktop to monitor stocks and other real
time information. Well, obviously if you don't follow the stock market
and don't use the stock ticker gadget that would seem like a pretty
useless upgrade to you personally. However, I'm sure there are plenty
of people who buy and trade stocks online who happen to use that
little stock ticker gadget, and for them upgrading from Windows XP to
Windows 7 would have features they find useful in trading stocks.

My point being not everything Microsoft adds to the latest Windows
release will be important to you personally and it may even seem like
the same thing different version, but for someone like me its really
and truly not the same thing. There are a number of reasons a person
might choose to upgrade weather it is bug fixes, security fixes, a new
look and feel, more gadgets, additional features, whatever. It all
depends on how much or how little you get out of your computer to
begin with.

Cheers!


On 12/11/11, Charles Rivard wee1s...@fidnet.com wrote:
 Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
 programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
 do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
 processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks?  Why can't they
 just leave well enough alone once they get a system that actually does what
 it's supposed to do?

 ---
 Security is not the absence of danger.  It is the presence of the Lord.

---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.