The following patch removes all dependencies to libconfuse when
--enable-static-build is used in preparation for removing libconfuse from
srclib.
This allows for a cleaner build process and using the system provided
libconfuse if available or whatever libconfuse library was provided at
compile tim
I just committed the modular-graph code to trunk: r1051.
Hopefully, it doesn't break anything horribly for anyone.
Rehashing this from the original email I posted a while back:
Each chart is generated from a specific .php file, with graph.php
acting as a gatekeeper for the specific graphing file
Hi,
Another vote for this patch!
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i like the idea too. anything that makes the frontend more modular and
> extendable is a good thing.
>
> -matt
>
>
>
> On 3/12/08, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> On 3/12/2008 at 4:31 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:20:45PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> I think I am going to see some more clarification on this.
>> --enable-static
> doesn't seem to fit exactly wit
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:20:45PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> I think I am going to see some more clarification on this. --enable-static
> doesn't seem to fit exactly with what we want to do. According to the
> automake docs (http://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_85.html),
> --
>>> On 3/12/2008 at 12:17 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This leads me back to asking the question, should we remove libconfuse from
> the repository as well?
>
> Either remove libconfuse or put back all libraries and keep using
> --ena
>>> On 3/12/2008 at 12:17 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:09:22AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> This leads me back to asking the question, should we remove libconfuse from
> the repository as well?
>
> Eithe
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:09:22AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>I know when we discussed this at the meeting a couple of weeks ago, the
> consensus was to leave libconfuse in the repository.
I mentioned a week ago, also, after removing expat from srclib, that
leaving confuse in the repository
I know when we discussed this at the meeting a couple of weeks ago, the
consensus was to leave libconfuse in the repository. I am in the middle of
reworking configure.in in order to remove APR yet still allow for
--enable-static-build. Everything works up to the point of 'make dist' or
'ma
i like the idea too. anything that makes the frontend more modular and
extendable is a good thing.
-matt
On 3/12/08, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Ramon Bastiaans
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like this setup a lot, has anyone considered this?
I agree it's a good step. Much better for modularity than the changes I
made to graph.php.
-Matt
Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Ramon Bastiaans
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I like this setup a lot, has anyone considered this?
>>
>
> Well, I have, but that do
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Ramon Bastiaans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like this setup a lot, has anyone considered this?
Well, I have, but that doesn't count.
> Doesn't seem to have made it's way into svn and I saw no more replies on
> this topic.
I don't think that it applies cleanl
I like this setup a lot, has anyone considered this?
Doesn't seem to have made it's way into svn and I saw no more replies on
this topic.
Cheers,
- Ramon - reading up on old mail..
Jesse Becker wrote:
> Below is a link to a patch against the current SVN trunk (r931) to split
> graphing into dis
13 matches
Mail list logo
