On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:31:35PM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote:
>
> While looking at this, I think I see an area for efficiency improvement.
gmetad hierarchical setups has several areas for efficiency improvement.
this one (doing summaries from partial summaries in the leafs) being one
that wa
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:55:58PM -0700, Gilad Raphaelli wrote:
> And some more problems. I'm getting this building gmond, gmetad, and
> gmetric. gmond, for example, says:
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.3 -I../lib
> -I../include/ -I../libmetrics -D_LARGE
Bernard said:
>I am running gmetad r1199 on a server which has one data_source which
is a server running gmetad 3.0.7 via port 8651.
>In the webfrontend, the summary "CPUs Total" shows nothing, however,
the "CPUs Total" for the data_source running gmetad 3.0.7 is correct.
I actually had done the
And some more problems. I'm getting this building gmond, gmetad, and gmetric.
gmond, for example, says:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.3 -I../lib
-I../include/ -I../libmetrics -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-I/Users/graph/local/include -I/opt/local/include
-I/opt/l
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fixed, I think, in r1190.
>
> Looks like it's still broken.
But in a different way. That's progress! Sorta.
> If my gmetad is aggregating anot
Carlo,
Good news
- Original Message
> From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Gilad Raphaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2008 11:13:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-de
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 05:40:04PM -0700, Gilad Raphaelli wrote:
>
> Would that look something like this?
>
> /opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.3 -dynamiclib ${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined
> ${wl}suppress -o .libs/libganglia-3.1.0..0.0.0.dylib .libs/gm_protocol_xdr.o
> .libs/become_a_nobody.o .lib
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:31:37PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 4/2/2008 at 2:43 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:08:04AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >> >>> On 4/1/2008 at 10:28 PM, in message <[EMAI
- Original Message
> From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2008 9:55:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-gene
Hi Carlo:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the fact that tarballs are not usable for public consumption as you explained
> in :
>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03804.html
Right -- I've just
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Carlo:
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > there is also the little inconvenience with the building of snapshots which
> > will need to be addressed since we are planni
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:25:23PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 4/2/2008 at 12:27 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > 1064carenas
Hi Carlo:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the fix wasn't yet complete, but even though there is still some more
> refactoring needed for the sum_finished lock, I couldn't reproduce this
> problem anymore with r1154.
>
> testing it with
>>> On 4/2/2008 at 2:43 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:08:04AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 4/1/2008 at 10:28 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
>> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed, I think, in r1190.
Looks like it's still broken.
If my gmetad is aggregating another gmetad, the "Grid" summary graph
has the gridname, but the "Cluster" summary graph does not (so instead
of "gridname Load last hou
>>> On 4/2/2008 at 12:27 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Carlo:
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Committed revision 1191.
>
> Confirmed working with r1199.
>
>> > 1064carenas
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:08:04AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 4/1/2008 at 10:28 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ok, but then if the application also has a need to access the metric data
> > (like gmond) then we will end
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What do you think about shortening the hostnames for display purposes (and
> > only display purposes in these charts? In all charts, or just the
Hi Jesse:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think about shortening the hostnames for display purposes (and
> only display purposes in these charts? In all charts, or just the small
> chart size? Do you think that removing everything after the
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gmetric injects metrics to the collection framework which gmond/gmetad
> belongs to, so to quote Martin, "by logic", they should belong in the
> same
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fixed, I think, in r1190.
>
> Almost.
>
> The per-host metric graphs' titles have hostnames before the
> metrictitle. Now that we are using the lon
Hi Jesse:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The gmond and gmetad programs certainly belong in /usr/sbin. I think gstat
> should stay in /usr/bin.
Sure.
> For gmetric, I don't have a good argument *for* either directory. Why
> should it be in /usr/sbin?
Hi Bernard,
by logic "gmetric" definitely belongs to ".../sbin". Personally I think
"gstat" and "gexec" belong to ".../bin". They are user commands and they are
not really part of the collection framework.
Oh, it is also good to see that "gstat" moved out of "gmond". That always
irritated me
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently gmetric and gstat are installed in /usr/bin, whereas gmond
> and gmetad are installed in /usr/sbin. IMHO I think all binaries
> should be installed to /usr/sbin. One might argue that maybe gstat
> should be made av
Martin:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Witham, Timothy D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> r1170 passes my tests. Thanks!
Now that the patch has been confirmed working in trunk, do you plan on
backporting this to the 3.0.x branch?
Thanks,
Bernard
Hi Jesse:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed, I think, in r1190.
Almost.
The per-host metric graphs' titles have hostnames before the
metrictitle. Now that we are using the long description for the
titles, you are almost guaranteed to run out of spa
Currently gmetric and gstat are installed in /usr/bin, whereas gmond
and gmetad are installed in /usr/sbin. IMHO I think all binaries
should be installed to /usr/sbin. One might argue that maybe gstat
should be made available to users, but I think gmetric should
definitely be confined to /usr/sbi
Hi Carlo:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Committed revision 1191.
Confirmed working with r1199.
> > 1064carenas if test -f "$libaprpath" ; then
> > 1064carenas APR_INCLUDES=`$libaprpath --includes`
> > 1064care
Hi Carlo:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is also the little inconvenience with the building of snapshots which
> will need to be addressed since we are planning in releasing an alpha
> snapshot
> with the creation of the branch.
>>> On 4/1/2008 at 10:28 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:32:49AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 3/31/2008 at 9:48 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
>> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
30 matches
Mail list logo
