No, that is not correct and it has periodically been invoked and people
have been charged with it.
On 10 November 2014 at 11:35, R C raulcisnero...@yahoo.com [gay_bombay]
gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com wrote:
QUESTION: I was under the impression that Section 377 is called a
De-Facto rule
QUESTION: I was under the impression that Section 377 is called a De-Facto
rule under which no one has been prosecuted yet in India. (Which means the rule
is there in existence, but has not been brought into effect til now)
Can you please clarify, if that is true?
Thanks, Rahul.
here is the link
http://www.thehoot.org/web/Striking-the-wrong-note---/7872-1-1-25-true.html
http://www.thehoot.org/web/Striking-the-wrong-note---/7872-1-1-25-true.html
Please post such important and interesting articles with the URL link. It is
required for archiving purposes! Please send the
Striking the wrong note...
* Salacious, prurient, insensitive - that is the yellow journalism
practiced by much of the media when it reports on gays. * The latest case
is a good illustration, says VIKRAM JOHRI
Posted/Updated Saturday, Nov 01 12:53:29, 2014
In June, a lesbian committed suicide
4 matches
Mail list logo
