There is something very special about this story. I is, I guess, the sharing
of something quite intimate between a mother and son. Inspiring, and
thanks for posting it.
From: Vikram D vg...@yahoo.co.uk [gay_bombay]
gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com
To: gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
hi R u in chennai? can u provide ur contact details?
On Monday, 24 November 2014 12:06 PM, vijay kumar mark34...@yahoo.com
[gay_bombay] gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com wrote:
#yiv5241268500 #yiv5241268500 -- #yiv5241268500
Hey vijay where are you dear ?
Just in case you ever happen to be photographed in an intimate position with
someone of the same sex and happen to need to explain it away you might want to
use this masterful explanation from Vivek Mishra, who seems to be someone
intent on making himself a celebrity by becoming India's first
No, that is not correct and it has periodically been invoked and people
have been charged with it.
On 10 November 2014 at 11:35, R C raulcisnero...@yahoo.com [gay_bombay]
gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com wrote:
QUESTION: I was under the impression that Section 377 is called a
De-Facto rule
We all have challenges but we make them better or worse by the way we talk
about them. - Joyce Meyer (Choice http://om.symphonyoflove.net/#choice @ OM)
Quoting Zig Ziglar, It's not what happens to you that matters. It's how you
respond to what happens to you that makes a difference.
More
Aditya, you are brilliant!
On Monday, 24 November 2014 12:12 PM, Vikram D vg...@yahoo.co.uk
[gay_bombay] gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com wrote:
When the Supreme Court upheld Section 377 one of the immediate reactions
was that this was a shocking case of the court empowering
7 matches
Mail list logo
