Richard Henderson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:23:34PM -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
In my view, this is implementation-defined, and generally can vary
depending upon the underlying linker and OS technology. Further,
there is at least one known platform (IA64) which seems to not impose
this res
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:14 AM, jacob navia wrote:
Where is the library I should link with?
nm libgcc_eh.a | grep register_frame
00e4 T ___register_frame_info
It is automatically linked with. I think you probably have the wrong
number of _ at the front, try removing one. After that, try nm
Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, I'm starting to be convinced that ignoring #pragma visibility for
> all template instantiations and specializations will be a simpler rule
> for users to understand.
I think I argued for that earlier; in any case, I agree.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Any comments on this patch? This patch, or something like it, is
absolutely necessary to support execute-in-place (XIP) on uClinux.
Please cc me in your reply. Cheers,
Shaun
On 6/29/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch forces the use of GOT relocations instead of GOTOFF when
On Jul 7, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I believe I recall we were not supposed to have either, but you raise
a good point. I will double check this with RMS, and if he agrees, I
will make sure to add the questionnaire (and buy Mike a drink next
time
I meet him).
I'd welcome them
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, James E Wilson wrote:
> I thought it was the actual legal forms that weren't supposed to be on
> the web site, but that the questionnaire was OK.
I believe I recall we were not supposed to have either, but you raise
a good point. I will double check this with RMS, and if he ag
> I thought it was the actual legal forms that weren't supposed to be on
> the web site, but that the questionnaire was OK. The legal forms can't
> be on the web site because too many people fill them out incorrectly,
> wasting the FSF's time and money. The questionnaire on the other hand
> is in
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:23:34PM -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> In my view, this is implementation-defined, and generally can vary
> depending upon the underlying linker and OS technology. Further,
> there is at least one known platform (IA64) which seems to not impose
> this restriction.
You're ki
FX Coudert wrote:
I'd like to include cases in the gfortran testsuite to check that we
correctly issue a run-time error, and exit with non-zero code.
Try dg-error. There are lots of examples to look at in existing
testcases, including in the gfortran.dg directory.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Su
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060707 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060707/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 13:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to ask you to remove this again. RMS explicitly
> requested we do not provide this on our web pages, or I would have
> added it years ago.
I thought it was the actual legal forms that weren't supposed to be on
the web site, b
On Jul 7, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I'm afraid I have to ask you to remove this again.
Done.
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
>> Please see the form in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
>> One of these days I will have to put this into the wiki.
> Added:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Copyright%20assignment
>
> Link t
On Jul 6, 2006, at 1:48 PM, FX Coudert wrote:
I'd like to be able to check that this code indeed issue the error
message on stderr and indicate to dejagnu that non-zero exit codes
does not mean that the test FAILed). How can I do that?
There are two strategies, first would be to write a driv
On Jul 6, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
Please see the form in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
One of these days I will have to put this into the wiki.
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Copyright%20assignment
Link to it added to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
see
Rajkishore Barik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am doing some modification to gcc's RTL code. I am trying to split a
> pseudo (old) into two pseudos (old and new)
> and rewriting some part of the code to replace the "old" pseudo by the
> "new" pseudo. I am using the "replace_rtx" function
> to
"Rodney M. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following example C code and disassembly is compiled by gcc 3.4.3,
> for i686. It uses two different invariants for what the value of
> a static link is. Everywhere inside P, static link values are consistently
> the same as base pointer (%ebp
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:23:24PM -0700, Matt Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for me to write a backend that accepts certain
> addressing modes for loads, while rejecting them for stores? I am not
> sure how to do this with the GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS macro. I know
> that this is not very sa
Yuri Pudgorodsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Yuri Pudgorodsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | The result of calling function pointer casted to sufficiently different
| > | type is
| > | a real example an undefined behavior.
| >
| > As I said earlie
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Yuri Pudgorodsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | The result of calling function pointer casted to sufficiently different
> | type is
> | a real example an undefined behavior.
>
> As I said earlier, it is fruitless to try to impose an ordering on
> the space of
jacob navia writes:
> Hi
>
> I want to use the function
>
> __register_frame_info
>
> to dynamically register DWARF2 unwind frames.
>
> Where is the library I should link with??
>
> Environment: linux 64 bits
prefix/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1; but you shouldn't specify this library becau
Hi
I want to use the function
__register_frame_info
to dynamically register DWARF2 unwind frames.
Where is the library I should link with??
Environment: linux 64 bits
Thanks in advance
Jacob
P.S. I have posted some messages here before, concerning this problem.
I had to do a long rewritin
Yuri Pudgorodsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| The result of calling function pointer casted to sufficiently different
| type is
| a real example an undefined behavior.
As I said earlier, it is fruitless to try to impose an ordering on
the space of undefined behaviour.
-- Gaby
Yuri Pudgorodsky writes:
>
> > We can say something like:
> >
> > "In GNU C, you may cast a function pointer of one type to a function
> > pointer of another type. If you use a function pointer to call a
> > function, and the dynamic type of the function pointed to by the
> > function poin
> We can say something like:
>
> "In GNU C, you may cast a function pointer of one type to a function
> pointer of another type. If you use a function pointer to call a
> function, and the dynamic type of the function pointed to by the
> function pointer is not the same as indicated by the static
25 matches
Mail list logo
